iQOO Neo9 Pro vs iQOO 12 Pro: Which Flagship Delivers the Best Value?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the iQOO 12 Pro justifies its higher price with the significant performance uplift from the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and the addition of 50W wireless charging. However, the iQOO Neo9 Pro remains a compelling option for gamers and power users prioritizing value and rapid 120W wired charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro | vivo iQOO 12 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 22 | 2023, November 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, February 22 | Available. Released 2023, November 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 75.7 x 8.0 mm or 8.3 mm | 164.6 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g or 196 g (6.70 oz) | 205 g or 210 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | - |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, ulti-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1" | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 11 min Reverse wired | 120W wired 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5160 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Fiery Red, Conqueror Black | Black, Red, White (BMW M branding) |
| Models | I2304 | V2329A |
| Price | - | About 650 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Extremely fast 120W wired charging
- Excellent performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Lacks wireless charging
- Potentially less advanced camera system
vivo iQOO 12 Pro
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless
- Likely more advanced camera system
- Higher price tag
- May run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays (based on iQOO’s typical offerings), specific details like peak brightness and panel technology are missing. However, the iQOO 12 Pro’s positioning suggests a potentially brighter and more color-accurate display. The Neo9 Pro’s focus on value might mean a slightly less advanced panel, but still excellent for everyday use. Both will likely feature similar resolutions, aiming for sharp visuals.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison. However, the iQOO 12 Pro, as the flagship, is expected to feature a more advanced camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and improved image stabilization. The Neo9 Pro will likely offer a capable camera setup, but may compromise on sensor size or lens quality to maintain its lower price point. Image processing algorithms will also play a role, with the 12 Pro potentially offering more sophisticated features like enhanced night mode and portrait capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO 12 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) boasts a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz, a step up from the Neo9 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) and its 3.2 GHz Cortex-X3. The Gen 3 also features improved Cortex-A720 cores, offering better sustained performance and efficiency. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and higher frame rates in demanding games. The iQOO 12 Pro’s LPDDR5x RAM will further enhance performance, while thermal management will be crucial to prevent throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both phones support 120W wired charging, promising incredibly fast top-ups. The Neo9 Pro claims a 50% charge in 11 minutes, and the 12 Pro should achieve similar speeds. However, the iQOO 12 Pro adds 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, providing greater flexibility. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the 12 Pro’s wireless charging capabilities suggest a slightly larger battery to accommodate the power draw.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro if you need a powerful gaming experience without breaking the bank, and prioritize the fastest possible wired charging. Buy the vivo iQOO 12 Pro if you demand the absolute best performance available in an Android phone, value the convenience of wireless charging, and are willing to pay a premium for the latest Snapdragon chipset.