iQOO Neo9 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy S24+: A Deep Dive into Performance, Charging, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a refined experience, software support, and a brighter display, the Samsung Galaxy S24+ is the superior choice. However, the iQOO Neo9 Pro delivers exceptional value, particularly for gamers and those who prioritize incredibly fast charging, offering near-flagship performance at a significantly lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 22 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, February 22 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 75.7 x 8.0 mm or 8.3 mm | 158.5 x 75.9 x 7.7 mm (6.24 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | 190 g or 196 g (6.70 oz) | 196 g or 197 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520)10-core (1x3.2GHz Cortex-X4 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.6GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.95GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) - USA/Canada/ChinaExynos 2400 (4 nm) - International |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) - USA/Canada/ChinaXclipse 940 - International |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1" | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 11 min Reverse wired | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5160 mAh | Li-Ion 4900 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Fiery Red, Conqueror Black | Onyx Black, Marble Grey, Cobalt Violet, Amber Yellow, Jade Green, Sandstone Orange, Sapphire Blue |
| Models | I2304 | SM-S926B, SM-S926B/DS, SM-S926U, SM-S926U1, SM-S926W, SM-S926N, SM-S9260, SM-S926E, SM-S926E/DS |
| Price | - | $ 429.50 / € 549.00 / £ 445.98 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.74 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Less refined software experience
- Display brightness and color accuracy likely inferior
- Camera system likely less versatile
Samsung Galaxy S24+
- Latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 or Exynos 2400 processor
- Brighter and more color-accurate display
- Refined software experience and long-term support
- Slower 45W wired charging
- Higher price point
- Potential for Exynos variant to exhibit lower performance
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1452 nits, making it far more usable in direct sunlight compared to the iQOO Neo9 Pro (brightness data unavailable, but expected to be lower). While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the S24+'s display technology likely incorporates LTPO for adaptive refresh rates, potentially improving battery efficiency. The S24+'s panel is also expected to have superior color accuracy, crucial for content creators. The iQOO Neo9 Pro's display specs are not provided, making a detailed comparison difficult, but it's likely a standard AMOLED panel.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs for the iQOO Neo9 Pro are missing, but the Galaxy S24+ is expected to offer a more versatile and refined camera system. Samsung typically excels in image processing, delivering vibrant and detailed photos. The S24+'s larger sensor size (spec not provided, but expected to be larger than the iQOO) and optical image stabilization (OIS) will improve low-light performance and reduce blur. The iQOO Neo9 Pro may rely more on software enhancements to compensate for potentially smaller sensors. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the iQOO Neo9 Pro is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Galaxy S24+ utilizes the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (in USA/Canada/China) or the Exynos 2400 (International), representing a generational leap over the iQOO Neo9 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. The Gen 3’s Cortex-X4 prime core, clocked at 3.39GHz, offers improved single-core performance, while the enhanced Cortex-A720 cores provide gains in multi-core tasks. The iQOO Neo9 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while still powerful, will likely exhibit more thermal throttling under sustained load. The S24+'s LPDDR5x RAM, coupled with the Gen 3, will also contribute to faster application loading and smoother multitasking. The Exynos 2400 variant of the S24+ may exhibit slightly lower performance and potentially higher power consumption compared to the Snapdragon version.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24+ achieves an impressive 12:30h active use score, indicating excellent battery life. While the iQOO Neo9 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its 120W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving 50% charge in just 11 minutes. The S24+’s 45W charging, reaching 65% in 30 minutes, is considerably slower. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The iQOO Neo9 Pro also offers reverse wired charging, a feature the S24+ supplements with 15W wireless reverse charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro if you need uncompromising charging speed (120W) and prioritize raw performance for gaming, and are comfortable with a less refined software experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24+ if you prefer a more polished user interface, a brighter and more color-accurate display, and longer-term software support, even if it means sacrificing some charging speed and paying a premium.