iQOO Neo8 vs Redmi K60 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a slightly more refined software experience, the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra emerges as the winner. The Dimensity 9200+ offers a CPU performance edge, and while both charge rapidly, the K60 Ultra achieves a full charge in a significantly shorter timeframe. However, the iQOO Neo8 remains a compelling option for those seeking a proven chipset and potentially better thermal management.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo8 | Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 23 | 2023, August 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 23 | Available. Released 2023, August 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass or leather back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 77 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Unspecified |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 or OriginOS 3 (China) | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+, 10-bit |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 9 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Red, Mint, Black | Black, White, Green |
| Models | V2301A | 23078RKD5C |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 330 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo8
- Proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Potentially better thermal management
- Fast 120W charging
- Slightly slower CPU performance compared to Dimensity 9200+
- Longer full charge time (9 mins to 50%)
Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra
- Faster Dimensity 9200+ CPU performance
- Full 120W charge in 19 minutes
- Potentially more advanced display technology
- May be prone to more thermal throttling
- Software experience can be more aggressive with notifications
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays (data not provided), the core difference lies under the hood. The iQOO Neo8’s display performance will be heavily reliant on its panel calibration and brightness capabilities. The Redmi K60 Ultra, given Xiaomi’s track record, likely boasts a higher peak brightness and potentially a more advanced display controller. The Dimensity 9200+’s display engine is designed to support higher refresh rates and resolutions, potentially giving the K60 Ultra an advantage in visual fidelity, assuming similar panel quality.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both brands typically prioritize main sensor quality. We can assume both phones will feature capable primary cameras. The Redmi K60 Ultra, given Xiaomi’s recent focus, might incorporate more advanced image processing algorithms. The iQOO Neo8 will likely lean towards a more natural color profile. The absence of information regarding OIS and sensor size makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the Redmi’s image processing pipeline is likely more sophisticated.
Performance
The chipset battle is central here. The iQOO Neo8’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) features an octa-core configuration with a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz. The Redmi K60 Ultra counters with the MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm), sporting a faster Cortex-X3 prime core at 3.35 GHz. This translates to a noticeable CPU performance advantage for the K60 Ultra in benchmarks. However, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is renowned for its efficiency and thermal management. The K60 Ultra’s Dimensity 9200+ may exhibit more throttling under sustained load, despite both being built on a 4nm process. The K60 Ultra also benefits from potentially faster LPDDR5x RAM, further boosting performance.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 120W wired charging, but the implementation differs. The iQOO Neo8 reaches 50% charge in 9 minutes, while the Redmi K60 Ultra achieves 100% in 19 minutes. This indicates a more optimized charging curve and potentially a more efficient charging IC in the K60 Ultra. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster full charge time suggests the K60 Ultra’s charging system is more effective, offsetting any potential capacity differences. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s efficiency could give the iQOO Neo8 a slight edge in battery life during moderate usage, but the K60 Ultra’s faster charging mitigates range anxiety.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo8 if you need a phone with a well-established chipset known for its stability and gaming prowess, and you value a potentially more conservative thermal profile. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra if you prefer the latest processor technology, prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds, and want a slight edge in raw CPU performance for demanding tasks.