vivo iQOO Neo8 vs Xiaomi 13T: A Deep Dive into Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak gaming performance and ultra-fast charging, the vivo iQOO Neo8 is the clear winner. However, the Xiaomi 13T offers superior battery life and a brighter display, making it a better choice for everyday users who value longevity and media consumption.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo8 | Xiaomi 13T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 23 | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 23 | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass or leather back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 77 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 193 g or 197 g (6.81 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 or OriginOS 3 (China) | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps (HDR10+), 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 9 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Red, Mint, Black | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | V2301A | 2306EPN60G |
| Price | About 330 EUR | $ 255.96 / £ 326.27 / € 204.18 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
vivo iQOO Neo8
- Ultra-fast 120W charging for minimal downtime
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Strong gaming capabilities due to the Snapdragon chipset
- Battery life likely inferior to the Xiaomi 13T
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
Xiaomi 13T
- Exceptional battery life with 12:23h active use
- Brighter display for improved outdoor visibility
- Excellent thermal management with Dimensity 8200 Ultra
- Slower charging speed compared to the iQOO Neo8
- Potentially lower peak CPU performance in short bursts
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1264 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the iQOO Neo8. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While the iQOO Neo8’s panel technology isn’t detailed, the Xiaomi 13T’s brightness advantage is a key differentiator for outdoor use. Both devices likely employ AMOLED panels, but the Xiaomi 13T’s higher peak brightness provides a tangible benefit for content consumption.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited, but the focus should be on the main sensors. Without knowing the sensor sizes or apertures, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Xiaomi generally emphasizes image processing and computational photography, potentially offering more refined images in various lighting conditions. The iQOO Neo8, leveraging the Snapdragon’s ISP, may prioritize speed and real-time processing. The absence of details on OIS for either device makes it difficult to assess low-light performance and video stabilization capabilities. Any 2MP macro or depth sensors on either phone are likely to be of limited practical use.
Performance
The iQOO Neo8’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) and the Xiaomi 13T’s Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4nm) are both built on efficient 4nm processes. However, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, offering a theoretical single-core performance advantage over the Dimensity 8200 Ultra’s Cortex-A78 core at 3.1 GHz. The Dimensity 8200 Ultra utilizes three Cortex-A78 cores, while the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 has three Cortex-A710 cores. In sustained workloads, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s thermal efficiency, while excellent for its time, may lead to more noticeable throttling compared to the Dimensity 8200 Ultra, which is known for its strong thermal management. The iQOO Neo8 will likely excel in bursty tasks, while the 13T will maintain performance longer.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13T shines in battery life, achieving an active use score of 12:23h and an endurance rating of 101h. This significantly surpasses what is typically expected from devices with similar specifications. The iQOO Neo8’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 120W wired charging is a major advantage, reaching 50% charge in just 9 minutes. The Xiaomi 13T’s 67W charging, while supporting PD3.0 and QC4, takes 42 minutes for a full charge. The trade-off is clear: the Xiaomi 13T offers significantly longer runtimes, while the iQOO Neo8 prioritizes incredibly fast top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo8 if you are a mobile gamer demanding consistently high frame rates and appreciate the convenience of 120W fast charging. Buy the Xiaomi 13T if you prioritize all-day battery life, a vibrant display for media, and a more balanced overall experience without sacrificing significant performance.