Both the Realme GT Neo 5 240W and the vivo iQOO Neo8 represent aggressive value propositions in the flagship-adjacent smartphone space. They share the same Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, but diverge significantly in charging speed, aiming at different user priorities – those who prioritize absolute recharge speed versus a more balanced approach. This comparison dissects those differences and determines which phone delivers the best experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W emerges as the winner. While both phones offer excellent performance thanks to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, the 240W charging is a game-changer, reducing downtime and offering a tangible benefit in daily use. The iQOO Neo8 remains a strong contender, especially for those less concerned with charging speed.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 23 | 2023, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 23 | Available. Released 2023, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass or leather back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 77 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | Illuminated RGB (on the back) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 or OriginOS 3 (China) | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 9 min | 240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Red, Mint, Black | Purple, Black, White |
| Models | V2301A | RMX3708 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 440 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo8
- Potentially more refined software experience (vivo's Funtouch OS)
- Competitive price point
- Solid all-around performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Slower 120W charging compared to the Realme GT Neo 5
- May lack some of the headline features of the Realme GT Neo 5
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- Revolutionary 240W charging – fastest in the market
- Slightly higher CPU clock speed for marginal performance gains
- Aggressive pricing for the features offered
- Realme UI may not appeal to all users
- Potential concerns about long-term battery health with extreme fast charging (though mitigated by charging algorithms)
Display Comparison
Both devices likely feature AMOLED panels, given their market positioning. However, specific details like peak brightness and refresh rate are missing. The Realme GT Neo 5's marketing emphasizes its display, suggesting a potentially higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility. The iQOO Neo8, while likely excellent, doesn't highlight display prowess as a key feature. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, reflecting current design trends. Color accuracy will likely be similar, tuned for vibrant, consumer-friendly profiles.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the Realme GT Neo 5's marketing often focuses on megapixel count, suggesting a potentially higher resolution main sensor. Image processing styles will likely differ – vivo typically leans towards more saturated, 'social media-ready' images, while Realme might aim for a more natural look. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the main sensor would be a significant advantage for low-light photography, but this is unconfirmed for either device.
Performance
The core performance is nearly identical, both powered by the Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm). However, the Realme GT Neo 5 boasts a slightly higher CPU clock speed (3.19 GHz vs 3.0 GHz on the iQOO Neo8), potentially offering a marginal performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks. Both utilize an octa-core configuration with 1x Cortex-X2, 3x Cortex-A710, and 4x Cortex-A510 cores. Thermal management will be crucial; the 4nm process helps, but sustained loads could lead to throttling. RAM speed (likely LPDDR5X on both) will also contribute to overall responsiveness.
Battery Life
This is where the Realme GT Neo 5 240W truly shines. While battery capacity is not specified, the 240W wired charging is a massive advantage, achieving 50% charge in just 4 minutes and 100% in 10 minutes. The iQOO Neo8's 120W charging is still fast, reaching 50% in 9 minutes, but the difference is substantial. The faster charging of the Realme GT Neo 5 effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery capacity, offering more flexibility and less 'range anxiety'.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo8 if you prioritize a slightly more refined software experience and don't mind a longer charging time. It's ideal for users who charge overnight or don't frequently deplete their battery. Buy the Realme GT Neo 5 240W if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging and value minimizing downtime, making it perfect for power users and gamers who need to quickly top up between sessions.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the 240W charging on the Realme GT Neo 5 degrade the battery faster?
While extreme fast charging has historically raised battery health concerns, modern charging algorithms and battery management systems mitigate this risk. The Realme GT Neo 5 incorporates multiple layers of protection to regulate temperature and voltage, minimizing long-term battery degradation. However, some minor degradation over years of use is inevitable with any battery technology.
❓ Is the slightly higher CPU clock speed on the Realme GT Neo 5 noticeable in real-world use?
The difference in CPU clock speed (3.19 GHz vs 3.0 GHz) is relatively small and unlikely to be noticeable in most everyday tasks. It might translate to a marginal improvement in benchmark scores or during sustained, CPU-intensive workloads like video editing, but the overall user experience will be very similar on both devices.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
Both phones are excellent for gaming thanks to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. The Realme GT Neo 5's faster charging allows for quicker top-ups during gaming sessions, which could be beneficial for extended play. Thermal management will be key; sustained gaming could lead to throttling on both devices, but the 4nm process helps minimize this.
❓ What are the software differences between vivo's Funtouch OS and Realme UI?
Funtouch OS (vivo) is generally considered to be more polished and feature-rich, but also more heavily customized. Realme UI aims for a cleaner, closer-to-stock Android experience with a focus on speed and customization. Preference is subjective; some users prefer the extensive features of Funtouch OS, while others prefer the simplicity of Realme UI.
