iQOO Neo8 Pro vs Redmi K60 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Dimensity 9200+ Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a slightly more refined software experience, the iQOO Neo8 Pro emerges as the winner. While both phones offer exceptional performance thanks to the Dimensity 9200+, the iQOO’s 120W charging achieves 50% charge in just 9 minutes, a significant advantage over the Redmi K60 Ultra’s 19-minute full charge time.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 23 | 2023, August 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 23 | Available. Released 2023, August 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass or leather back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 77 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Unspecified |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 or OriginOS 3 (China) | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+, 10-bit |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 9 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Red, Mint, Black | Black, White, Green |
| Models | V2302A | 23078RKD5C |
| Price | About 430 EUR | About 330 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W charging (50% in 9 mins)
- Optimized gaming performance due to focused software
- Potentially more efficient power management
- Software experience may be less feature-rich than MIUI
- Camera system details are currently unknown
Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra
- Feature-rich MIUI software experience
- Potentially better long-term software support
- Fast 120W charging (full charge in 19 mins)
- Slower charging speed compared to iQOO Neo8 Pro
- MIUI can be resource-intensive
Display Comparison
Both devices are expected to feature high refresh rate AMOLED displays, crucial for smooth gaming and media consumption. While specific details like peak brightness and color accuracy aren't provided, the Dimensity 9200+ supports displays up to 144Hz, suggesting both phones can deliver a fluid visual experience. The absence of LTPO technology in either spec sheet implies potentially higher power consumption at higher refresh rates compared to phones with adaptive refresh rate control.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests both phones will feature capable camera systems. The Redmi K60 Ultra, historically, tends to prioritize camera versatility, potentially offering a wider range of shooting modes and features. The iQOO Neo series often focuses on delivering strong primary camera performance. The absence of information regarding sensor size and OIS makes it impossible to determine which phone will excel in low-light photography or video stabilization.
Performance
The core of both phones is the MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm). This chipset boasts an octa-core configuration with a 3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 prime core, three 3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 performance cores, and four 2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. This identical CPU configuration guarantees comparable raw processing power. However, thermal management will be key. The 4nm process node is efficient, but sustained performance will depend on the cooling solutions implemented by vivo and Xiaomi. RAM type and speed (likely LPDDR5X) are also critical, but not specified, potentially influencing multitasking performance.
Battery Life
Both phones feature 120W wired charging, a significant advantage over slower charging standards. However, the iQOO Neo8 Pro achieves 50% charge in just 9 minutes, while the Redmi K60 Ultra requires 19 minutes for a full charge. This difference is substantial for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the iQOO Neo8 Pro effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery size.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro if you need the absolute fastest charging speeds available and value a streamlined, gaming-focused user interface. Its 120W charging is ideal for users constantly on the go. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra if you prefer a more feature-rich MIUI experience and potentially better long-term software support, accepting a slower, though still very fast, charging speed.