iQOO Neo8 Pro vs Xiaomi 13T Pro: A Deep Dive into Dimensity 9200+ Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a slightly more refined charging experience, the Xiaomi 13T Pro emerges as the winner. Its active use score of 11:50h and endurance rating of 102h demonstrate superior power management, offsetting the iQOO Neo8 Pro’s marginally faster peak charging speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro | Xiaomi 13T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 23 | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 23 | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass or leather back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 77 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 200 g or 206 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 or OriginOS 3 (China) | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 4K/1080p@30fps HDR10+, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; 10-bit LOG, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual/tri-band (market/region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 9 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Red, Mint, Black | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | V2302A | 23078PND5G |
| Price | About 430 EUR | $ 370.00 / £ 482.55 / € 301.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (50% in 9 mins)
- Potentially optimized for gaming (brand focus)
- Likely high refresh rate display
- Battery life likely inferior to Xiaomi 13T Pro
- Limited battery endurance data available
Xiaomi 13T Pro
- Excellent battery life (11:50h active use)
- High peak display brightness (1094 nits)
- Supports PD3.0 and QC4 charging standards
- Slower full charge time (19 mins)
- Camera specs currently unknown
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED panels, the Xiaomi 13T Pro distinguishes itself with a measured peak brightness of 1094 nits. This higher brightness translates to improved visibility in direct sunlight, a crucial advantage for outdoor users. The iQOO Neo8 Pro’s display specifications are currently unknown, but given its gaming focus, a high refresh rate is expected. However, without knowing its peak brightness or PWM dimming frequency, it’s difficult to assess its overall display quality relative to the Xiaomi.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications for both devices are limited. The Xiaomi 13T Pro is advertised with Photo/Video capabilities, suggesting a versatile camera system. However, without knowing sensor sizes, aperture values, or the presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), a meaningful comparison is impossible. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality and should be considered a secondary feature. Image processing algorithms will also play a crucial role in differentiating the final image output.
Performance
Both the iQOO Neo8 Pro and Xiaomi 13T Pro utilize the Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm), featuring an identical CPU configuration: 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510. This means raw processing power will be nearly indistinguishable between the two. The key differentiator will be thermal management. The 4nm process node is efficient, but sustained workloads will generate heat. Without detailed thermal testing data, it’s difficult to predict which device will exhibit less throttling during extended gaming sessions. RAM configuration (LPDDR5x speed) is also unknown for the iQOO Neo8 Pro, but impacts multitasking performance.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13T Pro boasts a significant advantage in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 11:50h of active use and a 102h endurance rating. While the iQOO Neo8 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its 120W wired charging is notably faster than the Xiaomi’s, reaching 50% charge in just 9 minutes. The Xiaomi 13T Pro takes 19 minutes to reach 100% with its 120W charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC4 standards. This faster charging speed on the iQOO Neo8 Pro is beneficial for users who frequently need a quick top-up, but the Xiaomi’s superior battery life reduces the need for constant charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging speeds and are comfortable with potentially more frequent top-ups. Its 120W charging reaches 50% in just 9 minutes, ideal for users who need a quick power boost. Buy the Xiaomi 13T Pro if you value sustained battery performance throughout a full day of heavy use and appreciate a more balanced approach to power management, even if it means a slightly longer full charge time.