The Realme GT5 Pro and vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive upper-midrange to flagship smartphone space. The GT5 Pro arrives with Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, promising top-tier performance, while the iQOO Neo8 Pro leverages the proven Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ and focuses on rapid charging. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device delivers the best experience for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and future-proofing, the Realme GT5 Pro is the clear winner thanks to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. However, the iQOO Neo8 Pro offers a compelling alternative with its incredibly fast 120W charging and competitive performance, making it ideal for users who value speed and convenience over absolute peak benchmarks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 23 | 2023, December 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 23 | Available. Released 2023, December 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass or leather back | Glass front, glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 77 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 161.7 x 75.1 x 9.2 mm (6.37 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 218 g / 224 g (7.69 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~92.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 or OriginOS 3 (China) | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 2.7x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (Dolby Atmos certified) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes, 360˚ |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 9 min | 100W wired, 50% in 12 min
50W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5400 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Red, Mint, Black | Black, Silver, Orange |
| Models | V2302A | RMX3888 |
| Price | About 430 EUR | About 430 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
- Incredibly fast 120W wired charging
- Competitive performance with Dimensity 9200+
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Missing wireless charging support
Realme GT5 Pro
- Top-tier performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Brighter 1660 nit display for outdoor visibility
- 50W wireless charging support
- Longer battery life (14:16h active use)
- Slower wired charging compared to iQOO Neo8 Pro
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Realme GT5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1660 nits, which translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the iQOO Neo8 Pro’s display specifications aren’t provided, it’s likely to be a high-quality panel, but will likely fall short of the GT5 Pro’s peak brightness. The GT5 Pro’s brightness advantage benefits users who frequently consume content outdoors. The absence of LTPO information for the iQOO Neo8 Pro suggests it may not have the same adaptive refresh rate efficiency as some GT5 Pro configurations, potentially impacting battery life during variable usage.
Camera Comparison
The Realme GT5 Pro’s camera system is highlighted as a key feature, though specific sensor details are missing. The mention of 'Photo / Video' suggests a focus on overall imaging quality. The iQOO Neo8 Pro’s camera specifications are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. However, given the Neo series’ positioning, it’s likely to prioritize value over cutting-edge camera technology. Users prioritizing photography and videography will likely find the GT5 Pro more appealing, assuming it features a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The absence of details on OIS for either device makes it impossible to assess stabilization capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Realme GT5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) versus the iQOO Neo8 Pro’s Dimensity 9200+ (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 features a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz, alongside a revised CPU architecture (3x A720 and 2x A520) offering improvements in both single-core and multi-core performance compared to the Dimensity 9200+'s Cortex-X3 (3.35 GHz) and A715/A510 configuration. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and higher frame rates in demanding games. The 4nm process node in both chips contributes to thermal efficiency, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s architectural improvements likely give it an edge in sustained performance under heavy load. The GT5 Pro’s LPDDR5x RAM will also contribute to faster data transfer speeds.
Battery Life
The Realme GT5 Pro demonstrates impressive battery life, achieving 14:16h in active use. While the iQOO Neo8 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its 120W wired charging (50% in 9 minutes) is significantly faster than the GT5 Pro’s 100W charging (50% in 12 minutes). The GT5 Pro also adds 50W wireless charging, a feature absent on the iQOO Neo8 Pro. The GT5 Pro’s longer battery life is ideal for all-day users, while the iQOO Neo8 Pro’s faster charging is perfect for those who need a quick power boost. The trade-off is endurance versus convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro if you need the fastest possible wired charging and prioritize a consistently smooth experience with a focus on daily usability. Buy the Realme GT5 Pro if you demand the absolute best performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and value a brighter display and potentially more advanced camera capabilities. The GT5 Pro is for the power user, while the iQOO Neo8 Pro is for the efficiency-minded user.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the Realme GT5 Pro experience thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is a powerful chip, sustained performance can be affected by thermal throttling. However, the GT5 Pro likely incorporates advanced cooling solutions to mitigate this, and the 4nm process node contributes to improved thermal efficiency compared to previous generations. Real-world testing will be needed to determine the extent of throttling under prolonged heavy load.
❓ How does the 120W charging on the iQOO Neo8 Pro impact battery health over the long term?
While 120W charging is incredibly fast, concerns about long-term battery health are valid. vivo likely employs charging algorithms and hardware protections to minimize degradation. However, consistently using the fastest charging speeds *may* contribute to slightly faster battery wear compared to slower charging methods. The convenience often outweighs this concern for many users.
❓ Is the lack of a dedicated telephoto lens on either phone a significant drawback?
The absence of specific telephoto lens details suggests both phones may rely on digital zoom for distant subjects. While digital zoom is convenient, it typically results in lower image quality compared to optical zoom. Users who frequently photograph distant objects may find this limitation noticeable.
