iQOO Neo8 Pro vs Oppo Find X6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Photography
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a well-rounded experience with exceptional camera quality, the Oppo Find X6 Pro is the superior choice. However, gamers and power users seeking maximum performance per dollar will find the iQOO Neo8 Pro’s Dimensity 9200+ and 120W charging a compelling package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro | Oppo Find X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 23 | 2023, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 23 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass or leather back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 77 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 164.8 x 76.2 x 9.1 mm or 9.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 216 g or 218 g (7.62 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO3 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1500 nits (HBM), 2500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 or OriginOS 3 (China) | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 9 min | 100W wired, PD, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 30 min 50W wireless, 50% in 22 min, 100% in 51 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Red, Mint, Black | Black, Green, Brown |
| Models | V2302A | PGEM110, PGEM10 |
| Price | About 430 EUR | About 820 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1294797 (v9) GeekBench: 4791 (v5.1), 5226 (v6) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Potentially higher multi-core CPU performance
- More affordable price point
- Likely inferior camera system
- Potentially less efficient thermal management
Oppo Find X6 Pro
- Superior camera quality and features
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- More efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
- Slower wired charging compared to iQOO
- Higher price tag
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1318 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the iQOO Neo8 Pro. While the iQOO likely offers a vibrant panel, the Find X6 Pro’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, but the Oppo’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor usability. Details regarding panel technology (LTPO) and refresh rate are missing for the iQOO, but the Find X6 Pro’s superior brightness suggests a more advanced display overall.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are advertised as having strong camera systems, but the Oppo Find X6 Pro is expected to excel in this area. While specific sensor details are absent, Oppo’s flagship typically features larger sensors and more advanced image processing algorithms. The iQOO Neo8 Pro likely offers a capable camera for everyday use, but the Find X6 Pro’s focus on photo and video quality, combined with its likely superior image stabilization (OIS), positions it as the better choice for photography enthusiasts. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely irrelevant, as image quality is typically poor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the iQOO Neo8 Pro utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm), while the Oppo Find X6 Pro features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm). Both are built on a 4nm process, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 generally exhibits superior sustained performance and thermal efficiency due to architectural improvements. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s CPU configuration (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) is subtly different from the iQOO’s (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715, 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510), potentially offering a slight edge in multi-core tasks for the iQOO, but the Snapdragon’s overall optimization and GPU performance will likely provide a smoother experience in demanding games. RAM specifications are missing for both, but both are expected to utilize LPDDR5x for fast memory access.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 114 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the iQOO). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The iQOO Neo8 Pro’s 120W wired charging can reach 50% in just 9 minutes, while the Oppo Find X6 Pro’s 100W charging takes 10 minutes for 45%. The iQOO also offers a significant advantage in wireless charging, with 50W support (50% in 22 minutes) compared to the Oppo’s 50W (50% in 22 minutes, 100% in 51 minutes). The iQOO’s faster wired charging is a major benefit for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro if you need uncompromising gaming performance, incredibly fast charging speeds, and are willing to make some compromises on camera versatility. Buy the Oppo Find X6 Pro if you prefer a top-tier camera system, a brighter and more refined display, and a more balanced overall experience, even if it comes at a higher price.