The iQOO Neo8 Pro and OnePlus Ace 2 Pro represent a fascinating clash in the Android space. Both target performance-hungry users, but achieve it through different chipsets and charging strategies. The iQOO leverages MediaTek’s Dimensity 9200+ while the OnePlus opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, creating a compelling head-to-head for those prioritizing speed and efficiency.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro emerges as the winner. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s superior thermal management and slightly more refined architecture translate to a smoother, more consistent experience, despite the iQOO’s impressive 120W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 23 | 2023, August 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 23 | Available. Released 2023, August 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass or leather back | Glass front (Asahi Glass), plastic frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 77 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 163.1 x 74.2 x 9 mm (6.42 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 550 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 or OriginOS 3 (China) | Android 13, ColorOS 13.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 9 min | 150W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Red, Mint, Black | Aurora Green, Titanium Gray |
| Models | V2302A | PJA110 |
| Price | About 430 EUR | About 380 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
- Extremely fast 120W charging
- Potentially lower price point
- High peak CPU clock speed
- Dimensity 9200+ may throttle under sustained load
- Potentially less refined image processing
OnePlus Ace 2 Pro
- Superior sustained performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Faster 150W charging
- More efficient thermal management
- Likely a higher price tag
- May require more careful power management
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED panels (data not provided), the core battle lies within the silicon. The impact on display performance is indirect; a more efficient chipset allows for smoother frame rates and less power draw, extending battery life while gaming. We anticipate both will offer excellent color accuracy and brightness, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s efficiency could translate to slightly better battery life during display-intensive tasks.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given the price points, we can expect both phones to feature capable camera systems. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally regarded as more advanced, offering better noise reduction and dynamic range. The iQOO may compensate with software optimizations, but the OnePlus likely holds an advantage in image processing quality. We expect both to offer competitive performance in good lighting conditions.
Performance
The heart of the matter: the Dimensity 9200+ in the iQOO Neo8 Pro versus the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro. Both are built on a 4nm process, but Qualcomm’s architecture offers a slight edge. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s CPU configuration (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) is optimized for sustained performance, while the Dimensity 9200+ (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715, 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) prioritizes peak clock speeds. This means the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro is likely to maintain higher frame rates for longer periods during demanding games. The inclusion of LPDDR5x RAM in both devices ensures fast memory access, but the Snapdragon’s superior thermal design will be crucial in maximizing its potential.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Ace 2 Pro’s 150W wired charging is a clear advantage over the iQOO Neo8 Pro’s 120W. While both are incredibly fast, the 150W system promises a quicker top-up, potentially shaving off several minutes during a charging session. The iQOO’s 120W still delivers a 50% charge in just 9 minutes, but the OnePlus is faster. Battery capacity is not specified, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery in the OnePlus, resulting in comparable real-world battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro if you need blazing-fast 120W charging and are comfortable with potentially more aggressive thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. It’s ideal for users who prioritize quick top-ups and don’t necessarily need peak sustained performance. Buy the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro if you prefer a more balanced experience with superior sustained performance thanks to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, and appreciate the slightly faster 150W charging, making it the better choice for demanding gamers and power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the iQOO Neo8 Pro overheat during prolonged gaming sessions like Genshin Impact?
The Dimensity 9200+ is a powerful chip, but it's known to generate more heat than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. Expect some thermal throttling during extended gaming, potentially leading to frame rate drops. The iQOO likely employs cooling solutions, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro will likely maintain higher sustained performance.
❓ How much faster is the 150W charging on the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro compared to the iQOO Neo8 Pro's 120W?
While both are incredibly fast, the 150W charging on the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro will likely shave off 5-10 minutes for a full charge. The iQOO Neo8 Pro reaches 50% in 9 minutes, and the OnePlus will be even quicker, offering a noticeable convenience for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro offer a significant performance boost in everyday tasks?
For typical daily use like browsing, social media, and video streaming, the performance difference will be minimal. Both chips are more than capable of handling these tasks smoothly. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s advantage becomes more apparent in demanding applications like gaming and video editing.
