The iQOO Neo8 Pro and Honor 90 GT represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-to-high range smartphone market. Both prioritize performance, but take different approaches – the iQOO leveraging MediaTek’s flagship Dimensity 9200+ while the Honor opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits power users and mobile gamers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the Honor 90 GT emerges as the winner. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s superior thermal efficiency and slightly more refined architecture translate to consistently higher frame rates and less throttling, despite the iQOO Neo8 Pro’s impressive 120W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 23 | 2023, December 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 23 | Available. Released 2023, December 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass or leather back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 77 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 161 x 74.2 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1200 x 2664 pixels (~436 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.5 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 or OriginOS 3 (China) | Android 13, MagicOS 7.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/2, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 9 min | 100W wired, 3-100% in 32 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Red, Mint, Black | Black, Blue, Gold |
| Models | V2302A | MAG-AN00 |
| Price | About 430 EUR | About 330 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Potentially lower price point
- High-clocked Cortex-X3 core
- Dimensity 9200+ may throttle under sustained load
- No reverse wireless charging
Honor 90 GT
- Superior sustained performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- More efficient power consumption
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Slower 100W charging (32 minutes 0-100%)
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
While specific display details are absent, both phones likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels, standard for this segment. However, the chipset choice impacts display performance. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s Adreno 740 GPU is a more capable display driver, potentially enabling smoother visuals and higher frame rates in graphically demanding games. The iQOO Neo8 Pro’s Dimensity 9200+ will still deliver a great experience, but may exhibit slightly more frame drops under heavy load. We expect both to have similar color accuracy and brightness levels, typical of modern AMOLEDs.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, both brands typically focus on delivering competitive camera systems in this price range. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally considered more advanced, offering better noise reduction and dynamic range. We anticipate both phones will feature capable main sensors, but the Honor 90 GT likely benefits from Qualcomm’s superior image processing algorithms. The presence or absence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the main sensor will be a crucial differentiator, impacting low-light performance and video stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor 90 GT’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) boasts a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, alongside two Cortex-A715 cores at 2.8 GHz and two Cortex-A710 cores at 2.8 GHz, plus three Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. This contrasts with the iQOO Neo8 Pro’s Dimensity 9200+ (4nm) featuring a 3.35 GHz Cortex-X3, three Cortex-A715 cores at 3.0 GHz, and four Cortex-A510 cores at 2.0 GHz. While the iQOO has a higher clocked X3 core, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s architecture and thermal efficiency are superior. The Snapdragon’s more refined process and larger cache generally lead to better sustained performance and less throttling during prolonged gaming. Both utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the Snapdragon’s integrated memory controller offers a slight edge.
Battery Life
The iQOO Neo8 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a standout feature, capable of charging 50% in just 9 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Honor 90 GT’s 100W charging, which takes 32 minutes for a full 0-100% charge. However, charging speed isn’t everything. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s greater power efficiency means the Honor 90 GT will likely consume less battery during typical usage and gaming, potentially offsetting the iQOO’s faster charging. The Honor 90 GT also includes 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the iQOO Neo8 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro if you need the absolute fastest charging speeds available and prioritize a slightly more aggressive price point. Its 120W charging is a significant advantage for those constantly on the move. Buy the Honor 90 GT if you prefer a more balanced experience with consistently higher performance during extended gaming sessions and appreciate Qualcomm’s established ecosystem and potentially better software optimization.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 9200+ in the iQOO Neo8 Pro overheat during prolonged gaming sessions like Genshin Impact?
The Dimensity 9200+ is a powerful chip, but it's known to generate more heat than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. While the iQOO Neo8 Pro likely has cooling solutions, expect some throttling after 30-60 minutes of intensive gaming, potentially leading to frame rate drops. The Honor 90 GT’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 will maintain higher sustained performance.
❓ How does the 100W charging on the Honor 90 GT compare to the 120W charging on the iQOO Neo8 Pro in real-world usage?
While 120W is faster on paper, the difference isn't always dramatic. The iQOO Neo8 Pro charges from 0-50% in 9 minutes, while the Honor 90 GT takes longer. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s efficiency means you may not need to charge as frequently, lessening the impact of the slower charging speed. Both offer incredibly fast top-ups.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and Dimensity 9200+ noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For typical daily use, the performance difference will be minimal. Both chips are more than capable of handling everyday tasks smoothly. The benefits of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 become more apparent in demanding applications like gaming and video editing.
