iQOO Neo8 Pro vs Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and rapid charging, the iQOO Neo8 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9200+ chipset and 120W charging significantly outperform the Pixel 7 Pro. However, the Pixel 7 Pro excels in camera quality and offers a more polished, AI-driven software experience, making it ideal for photography enthusiasts and those deeply integrated into the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 23 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 23 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass or leather back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 77 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 or OriginOS 3 (China) | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 9 min | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Red, Mint, Black | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | V2302A | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | About 430 EUR | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Superior CPU performance with Dimensity 9200+
- Potentially better thermal management due to 4nm process
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel
- Camera likely doesn't match Pixel's computational photography
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional camera quality and Google’s AI features
- Smooth and refined software experience
- Wireless charging and reverse wireless charging
- Significantly slower charging speed (23W)
- Less powerful chipset for demanding games
- Older CPU architecture
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 7 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1090 nits, providing excellent visibility in bright sunlight. While the iQOO Neo8 Pro’s display specs aren’t provided, its market positioning suggests a comparable AMOLED panel. The Pixel 7 Pro’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) delivers deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Pixel 7 Pro’s display is likely to have a variable refresh rate (LTPO) for power efficiency, a feature not confirmed for the iQOO Neo8 Pro. The Pixel 7 Pro’s larger display size and potentially higher resolution will offer a more immersive viewing experience for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro is renowned for its camera capabilities, leveraging Google’s computational photography expertise. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, the Pixel 7 Pro’s camera excels in both photo and video, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Tensor G2’s image signal processor (ISP) plays a crucial role in processing images, delivering exceptional dynamic range and detail. The iQOO Neo8 Pro’s camera specs are not detailed, but its focus is likely on delivering a versatile camera system rather than competing directly with the Pixel 7 Pro’s computational photography prowess. The Pixel 7 Pro’s advanced features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur provide unique editing capabilities.
Performance
The iQOO Neo8 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm) chipset is a powerhouse, featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.35 GHz. This architecture is designed for peak performance, exceeding the Pixel 7 Pro’s Google Tensor G2 (5nm) which utilizes older Cortex-X1 cores at 2.85 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 9200+ generally offers better power efficiency than the 5nm Tensor G2, potentially leading to less thermal throttling during sustained workloads. While the Tensor G2 excels in AI tasks, the Dimensity 9200+ provides a significant advantage in raw CPU and GPU performance, crucial for gaming and demanding applications. The iQOO Neo8 Pro likely utilizes faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing its performance edge.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 83 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The iQOO Neo8 Pro’s 120W wired charging can replenish 50% of the battery in just 9 minutes, a significant advantage over the Pixel 7 Pro’s 23W wired charging, which takes 30 minutes for the same result. The Pixel 7 Pro offers 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the iQOO Neo8 Pro. While the iQOO Neo8 Pro’s faster charging mitigates concerns about battery capacity, the Pixel 7 Pro’s wireless charging options provide added convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro if you need uncompromising performance for demanding mobile games, require the fastest possible charging speeds, and value raw power over software refinement. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prefer a seamless software experience, prioritize exceptional camera quality with Google’s computational photography, and appreciate long-term software updates and Google’s AI features.