iQOO Neo7 SE vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ edges out the iQOO Neo7 SE thanks to its superior camera system, slightly better battery life, and faster charging (advertised). However, the iQOO Neo7 SE boasts a more powerful chipset, making it a strong choice for gamers and performance enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo7 SE | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International, China |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 08 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 08 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.34 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 208.4 g (7.34 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6877V Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 60% in 10 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min (advertised) |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gray, Gradient | Arctic White, Iceberg Blue, Obsidian Black, Trend edition |
| Models | V2238A, V2238 | 22101316UCP, 22101316UG |
| Price | About 300 EUR | $ 348.00 / £ 439.00 / € 399.00 / ₹ 29,949 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.7 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 498710 (v9) GeekBench: 2208 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 8200)
- Fast 120W charging
- Likely higher refresh rate display
- Competitive price
- Potentially less impressive camera
- Battery life may be slightly shorter
- Design may be less premium
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+
- Superior camera system
- Longer battery life (advertised)
- Fast 120W charging
- Potentially better display contrast
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 1080)
- May be slightly more expensive
- Software experience can vary
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting potentially superior image quality, but real-world differences might be subtle. The iQOO Neo7 SE likely has a higher refresh rate (typically 120Hz) for smoother scrolling and gaming, while the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ may offer adaptive refresh rate technology to conserve battery.
Camera Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is expected to have a more versatile and higher-resolution camera system, likely including a high-megapixel main sensor and potentially improved image processing. While the iQOO Neo7 SE has a capable camera, the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is likely to produce more detailed and visually appealing photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. Video recording capabilities are likely comparable.
Performance
The iQOO Neo7 SE's Dimensity 8200 chipset holds a clear advantage over the Redmi Note 12 Pro+'s Dimensity 1080. The 8200 generally delivers faster processing speeds and better graphics performance, making it a better choice for demanding games and multitasking. The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is still capable, but won't match the iQOO's raw power.
Battery Life
Both phones offer 120W fast charging, promising incredibly quick top-ups. The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ boasts an impressive 88h endurance rating, suggesting slightly better battery life under typical usage. However, charging speed often outweighs battery capacity in this segment, and both phones will charge very quickly.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Neo7 SE is ideal for gamers and users prioritizing raw processing power. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is a better fit for photography enthusiasts and those seeking a well-rounded experience with a focus on camera quality and battery endurance.