Both the vivo iQOO Neo7 SE and the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra target the performance-focused mid-range segment, but they approach it with different chipsets and slightly varying priorities. The iQOO Neo7 SE, leveraging the Dimensity 8200, aims for a balance of power and efficiency, while the K60 Ultra, with the Dimensity 9200+, pushes for near-flagship performance. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra emerges as the stronger choice. The Dimensity 9200+ provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Dimensity 8200 in the iQOO Neo7 SE, justifying the potential price premium. However, the iQOO Neo7 SE remains a compelling option for budget-conscious gamers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 08 | 2023, August 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 08 | Available. Released 2023, August 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.34 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Unspecified |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+, 10-bit |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 60% in 10 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gray, Gradient | Black, White, Green |
| Models | V2238A, V2238 | 23078RKD5C |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 330 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
- Potentially lower price point
- Excellent performance for the price
- Fast 120W charging
- Dimensity 8200 is outperformed by the 9200+
- Camera system likely less advanced
Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra
- Superior performance with Dimensity 9200+
- Faster 120W charging (full charge in 19 mins)
- Potentially better camera system
- Likely higher price tag
- May run slightly warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED displays (data not provided), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. The chipset impacts the smoothness of animations and responsiveness. Without specific display specs, it's difficult to assess color accuracy or peak brightness, but both brands typically deliver vibrant panels. The K60 Ultra's superior processing power will contribute to a more fluid user experience, especially during fast-paced gaming.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, Xiaomi’s Redmi K series often prioritizes camera capabilities, potentially giving the K60 Ultra an edge in image quality and features. The Dimensity 9200+ also boasts a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) which can improve image processing speed and quality. The iQOO Neo series typically focuses more on performance, so the camera system may be less sophisticated. We can assume both phones will have capable main sensors, but the K60 Ultra is likely to offer more advanced features like better low-light performance and video stabilization.
Performance
The Redmi K60 Ultra’s Dimensity 9200+ is the clear winner here. Built on the same 4nm process as the iQOO Neo7 SE’s Dimensity 8200, the 9200+ features the more powerful Cortex-X3 prime core (3.35 GHz vs 3.1 GHz Cortex-A78), resulting in significantly improved single-core performance. The K60 Ultra also benefits from newer Cortex-A715 performance cores (3.0 GHz) compared to the A78 cores in the iQOO. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and higher frame rates in demanding games. While both utilize LPDDR5X RAM (assumed based on market segment), the 9200+'s superior GPU will provide a more substantial gaming advantage.
Battery Life
Both phones feature 120W wired charging, a significant advantage over slower charging competitors. However, the Redmi K60 Ultra claims a full charge in 19 minutes, while the iQOO Neo7 SE reaches 60% in 10 minutes. This suggests the K60 Ultra’s charging implementation is more efficient, delivering a complete charge faster. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the K60 Ultra mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery size, offering less downtime for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo7 SE if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and still require strong gaming performance for titles like *Genshin Impact* at medium settings. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra if you demand the highest possible performance in this price bracket, frequently play graphically intensive games at maximum settings, and value faster charging speeds for minimal downtime.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi K60 Ultra's Dimensity 9200+ overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 9200+ is a powerful chip, Xiaomi typically implements robust thermal management solutions in their K series devices. Expect some heat during extended gaming, but throttling should be minimized, maintaining consistent performance. The K60 Ultra's cooling system is likely more advanced than the iQOO Neo7 SE's to handle the increased thermal output.
❓ How does the 120W charging on the iQOO Neo7 SE compare to the K60 Ultra in real-world usage?
Both phones offer incredibly fast charging, but the K60 Ultra's ability to reach 100% in 19 minutes is faster than the iQOO Neo7 SE's 60% in 10 minutes. This means the K60 Ultra will provide a quicker top-up, minimizing downtime for users who frequently need to recharge.
❓ Is the performance difference between the Dimensity 9200+ and 8200 noticeable in everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and video playback, the difference will be minimal. However, when launching demanding apps, multitasking, or playing graphically intensive games, the Dimensity 9200+ in the K60 Ultra will provide a noticeably smoother and more responsive experience.
