The iQOO Neo7 SE and Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Neo7 SE prioritizes blazing-fast 120W charging and a recent Dimensity 8200 chipset, while the Poco F5 Pro leverages the proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 and a bright, high-contrast display. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro emerges as the stronger all-rounder. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, despite being a generation older, offers consistently high performance and excellent thermal management, paired with a brighter display. While the iQOO Neo7 SE’s 120W charging is undeniably impressive, the Poco F5 Pro’s overall package provides a more balanced experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 08 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 08 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.34 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 60% in 10 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gray, Gradient | Black, White |
| Models | V2238A, V2238 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 300 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
- Ultra-fast 120W wired charging
- Modern Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Unspecified battery capacity
- Likely less refined camera system
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Brighter and more visible display
- Proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Wireless charging support
- Slower wired charging compared to iQOO Neo7 SE
- May be slightly more expensive
- No significant camera advantage over competitors
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1059 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the iQOO Neo7 SE. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While both displays feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for OLED panels), the higher peak brightness of the Poco F5 Pro provides a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rate switching rather than variable refresh rates for power saving.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given Xiaomi’s history with flagship-level camera systems, the Poco F5 Pro likely benefits from more sophisticated image processing algorithms and potentially a larger main sensor. The iQOO brand tends to focus more on performance than camera prowess, suggesting the Poco F5 Pro may have an edge in image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. We can safely assume both will include standard features like HDR and portrait modes.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) utilizes a 1x Cortex-X2 prime core for peak performance, while the iQOO Neo7 SE’s Dimensity 8200 (4nm) employs a 1x Cortex-A78 core. Although clock speeds are comparable (3.1GHz vs 3.0GHz), the Cortex-X2 generally delivers superior single-core performance. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s architecture, coupled with its mature optimization, is likely to provide more consistent frame rates in demanding games and applications, with less thermal throttling. Both devices utilize 4nm fabrication, but Qualcomm’s process is known for its efficiency.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (unspecified for the iQOO Neo7 SE). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The iQOO Neo7 SE’s 120W wired charging can replenish 60% of the battery in just 10 minutes, while the Poco F5 Pro’s 67W charging takes 15 minutes for 50%. The Poco F5 Pro also offers 30W wireless charging, a feature absent on the iQOO Neo7 SE. The iQOO Neo7 SE’s charging speed is a clear advantage for users who need a quick power boost, but the Poco F5 Pro’s wireless charging adds convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo7 SE if you absolutely prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and frequently top up your phone throughout the day. Its 120W charging is a game-changer for minimizing downtime. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you value sustained performance during demanding tasks like gaming, a brighter and more visible display, and a more refined overall user experience. It’s the better choice for power users and mobile gamers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known for its improved thermal efficiency compared to the original 8 Gen 1. While some throttling is inevitable, the Poco F5 Pro’s cooling system (details unspecified) should be sufficient to maintain stable performance during extended gaming sessions, offering a more consistent experience than the iQOO Neo7 SE is likely to provide.
❓ How much faster is the 120W charging on the iQOO Neo7 SE compared to the 67W charging on the Poco F5 Pro in real-world use?
The iQOO Neo7 SE can gain 60% charge in 10 minutes, while the Poco F5 Pro takes 15 minutes for 50%. This means a full charge on the iQOO Neo7 SE will be significantly faster, potentially taking under 30 minutes. However, the Poco F5 Pro’s 67W charging is still respectable and will provide a substantial charge in a relatively short amount of time.
❓ Does the Poco F5 Pro support high refresh rate gaming, and can it maintain stable frame rates in demanding titles like Genshin Impact?
While the refresh rate isn't specified, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is capable of driving high refresh rate displays. The Poco F5 Pro should be able to run Genshin Impact at 60fps with high settings. Sustained performance will depend on the device's thermal management, but the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is generally well-equipped to handle demanding games.
