The vivo iQOO series consistently delivers impressive value, and the Neo7 SE and Neo 6 are prime examples. Both offer compelling features at competitive prices, but cater to slightly different users. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which iQOO phone is the perfect fit for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO Neo7 SE boasts significantly faster charging and a newer, more efficient chipset. However, the Neo 6 offers excellent battery life and a proven Snapdragon 870. For speed and charging, the Neo7 SE wins; for longevity and a reliable processor, the Neo 6 remains a strong contender.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 08 | 2022, May 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 08 | Available. Released 2022, May 31 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.34 in) | 163 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 60% in 10 min | 80W wired, 50% in 12 min, 100% in 32 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gray, Gradient | Dark Nova, Cyber Rage |
| Models | V2238A, V2238 | I2126 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 97h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.0 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 627246 (v8), 730223 (v9)
GeekBench: 3076 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
- Faster Charging (120W)
- Newer Chipset (Dimensity 8200)
- Potentially Better Gaming Performance
- More Efficient Processor
- Camera details are limited
- Battery life might be slightly less than Neo 6
- Software optimization might be less mature
vivo iQOO Neo 6
- Excellent Battery Life (97h Endurance)
- Proven Snapdragon 870 Performance
- Likely Better Camera Software
- Good Display Brightness
- Slower Charging (80W)
- Older Chipset
- Less Efficient Processor
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays, but the Neo 6's 772 nits peak brightness gives it a slight edge in outdoor visibility. The Neo7 SE likely has a similar brightness, but specific measurements are needed for a definitive comparison. The Neo 6's infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deep blacks and excellent image quality, though this is a marketing term and real-world performance is key.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited in the provided specs. Both phones are described as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities. However, the Neo 6 likely has a more refined camera system due to its longer market presence and potential software optimizations. Expect similar image quality in good lighting conditions, but the Neo 6 might offer better low-light performance and video stabilization.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 8200 in the Neo7 SE is a newer chipset built on a 4nm process, offering improved efficiency and potentially better gaming performance compared to the Snapdragon 870 in the Neo 6 (7nm). While the Snapdragon 870 remains a powerful chip, the Neo7 SE's newer architecture should provide a noticeable performance boost, especially in demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The iQOO Neo 6 shines in this category with an impressive endurance rating of 97 hours. The Neo7 SE's battery capacity is likely similar, but the Dimensity 8200's efficiency will play a role. The Neo 7 SE's 120W charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups, while the Neo 6's 80W charging is still quite fast.
Buying Guide
The iQOO Neo7 SE is ideal for gamers and power users who prioritize fast charging and the latest processor technology. The iQOO Neo 6 is a great choice for those seeking exceptional battery life, a well-rounded camera system, and a dependable Snapdragon 870 processor, especially if charging speed isn't a top priority.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the iQOO Neo7 SE worth the upgrade from the Neo 6?
If you prioritize fast charging and the latest processor for gaming, then yes. Otherwise, the Neo 6 remains a very capable phone with excellent battery life.
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The iQOO Neo7 SE likely offers better gaming performance due to its newer Dimensity 8200 chipset and 4nm process.
