The OnePlus Ace 2 Pro and vivo iQOO Neo7 SE represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-to-high range smartphone market. The Ace 2 Pro, powered by the flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, aims for top-tier performance, while the iQOO Neo7 SE leverages the efficient Dimensity 8200 to deliver a strong experience at a potentially lower price point. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw power and future-proofing, the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset offers a significant performance advantage, especially in demanding tasks. However, the iQOO Neo7 SE provides excellent value, delivering a smooth experience for everyday use and gaming at a more accessible price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 08 | 2023, August 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 08 | Available. Released 2023, August 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Asahi Glass), plastic frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.34 in) | 163.1 x 74.2 x 9 mm (6.42 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 550 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, ColorOS 13.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 60% in 10 min | 150W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gray, Gradient | Aurora Green, Titanium Gray |
| Models | V2238A, V2238 | PJA110 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 380 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
- Incredibly fast 120W charging
- Excellent value for money
- Capable Dimensity 8200 performance
- Less powerful chipset than the Ace 2 Pro
- Potentially less advanced camera system
OnePlus Ace 2 Pro
- Flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Ultra-fast 150W charging
- Superior graphics capabilities
- Higher price point
- May run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED displays (based on brand trends), the provided data doesn't specify display characteristics. However, the chipset differences suggest the Ace 2 Pro may support higher resolution panels and more advanced display features. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP is capable of handling higher resolution and refresh rate displays with greater efficiency. The iQOO Neo7 SE, while still offering a vibrant experience, will likely focus on optimizing performance for its Dimensity 8200.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks camera specifications. However, given the Ace 2 Pro’s positioning as a higher-end device, it’s reasonable to expect a more sophisticated camera system with a larger primary sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) offers advanced features like 8K video recording and improved low-light performance. The iQOO Neo7 SE will likely offer a competent camera experience, but may prioritize cost-effectiveness over cutting-edge features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Ace 2 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) boasts a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, significantly exceeding the iQOO Neo7 SE’s Dimensity 8200’s 3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 core. This architectural advantage, combined with the Snapdragon’s more modern Cortex-A715/A710 cores versus the Dimensity’s A78 cores, translates to superior multi-core and single-core performance. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s Adreno 740 GPU also provides a substantial leap in graphics performance, benefiting gamers and users of graphically demanding applications. The 4nm fabrication process of both chips contributes to efficiency, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s architecture is optimized for sustained performance and reduced thermal throttling.
Battery Life
Both phones champion fast charging, but the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro takes the lead with 150W wired charging, promising even faster top-ups compared to the iQOO Neo7 SE’s 120W. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Ace 2 Pro’s faster charging is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s improved power efficiency may also contribute to slightly better battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity to the iQOO Neo7 SE.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo7 SE if you need a capable all-rounder with incredibly fast 120W charging and prioritize value for money. It’s ideal for everyday users, social media enthusiasts, and casual gamers. Buy the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro if you demand the absolute best performance for gaming, content creation, or power-intensive applications, and are willing to pay a premium for the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and its associated benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 8200 in the iQOO Neo7 SE struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 8200 is a capable chip, Genshin Impact at maximum settings may require some graphical compromises on the iQOO Neo7 SE to maintain a consistently smooth frame rate. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Ace 2 Pro will handle these titles with ease.
❓ How long does it *really* take to fully charge each phone with their respective fast charging technologies?
vivo claims the iQOO Neo7 SE reaches 60% charge in 10 minutes with 120W. Expect a full charge in around 25-30 minutes. The OnePlus Ace 2 Pro’s 150W charging is even faster, potentially achieving a full charge in under 20 minutes, though real-world results will vary based on battery temperature and usage.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and Dimensity 8200 noticeable in everyday tasks?
For typical daily use like browsing, social media, and video streaming, the difference will be minimal. Both phones will feel responsive and fluid. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s advantage becomes more apparent in demanding tasks like video editing, gaming, and running multiple apps simultaneously.
