vivo iQOO Neo7 SE vs. Motorola Moto X40: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Moto X40 takes the crown thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset and faster charging. While the iQOO Neo7 SE offers excellent value, the X40's performance and premium features make it the superior choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo7 SE | Motorola Moto X40 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA 800 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 08 | 2022, December 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 08 | Available. Released 2022, December 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.34 in) | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, MYUI 6.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256GB/512GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Ready For 3.5 support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 60% in 10 min | 125W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 7 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gray, Gradient | Black, Blue |
| Models | V2238A, V2238 | XT2301-5 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 540 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
- Excellent value for money
- Fast 120W charging
- Smooth performance for everyday tasks
- Good display
- Less powerful chipset than the Moto X40
- No wireless charging
- Potentially less refined camera
Motorola Moto X40
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Faster 125W charging
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Potentially better camera and display
- Higher price point
- Motorola's software experience may not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant OLED displays, but the Moto X40 likely boasts a slightly higher peak brightness and potentially a more refined color calibration. The X40's display may also have a higher refresh rate (likely 144Hz vs. the Neo7 SE's 120Hz), resulting in smoother scrolling and animations. Screen sizes are likely similar, around 6.6-6.7 inches.
Camera Comparison
While specific camera specs are needed for a definitive comparison, the Moto X40's Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 typically pairs with a more advanced image signal processor (ISP), potentially leading to better image quality, especially in low light. Both phones likely feature a main sensor around 50MP, but the X40's processing could give it an edge. Video recording capabilities are also likely superior on the X40.
Performance
This is where the Moto X40 truly shines. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is a flagship-level chipset, significantly outperforming the Dimensity 8200. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance on the X40. The Neo7 SE is still capable, but it won't match the X40's raw power.
Battery Life
Both offer fast charging, but the Moto X40's 125W wired charging is faster than the Neo7 SE's 120W. The X40 also includes 15W wireless charging and 5W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the Neo7 SE. Battery capacities are likely similar, around 4500-5000mAh, so real-world battery life should be comparable, though the X40's more efficient chipset could give it a slight advantage.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Neo7 SE is ideal for budget-conscious gamers and users who prioritize fast charging and a smooth experience without breaking the bank. The Motorola Moto X40 is perfect for power users, mobile gamers demanding top-tier performance, and those who appreciate a more premium design and features like wireless charging and reverse wireless charging.