iQOO Neo7 Racing vs Redmi K60 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value

The iQOO Neo7 Racing and Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive sub-$500 smartphone market. While both prioritize fast charging and gaming capabilities, they diverge significantly in their core processing power, with the K60 Pro boasting the newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro emerges as the superior choice. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides a noticeable performance uplift over the 8+ Gen 1 in the iQOO Neo7 Racing, translating to smoother multitasking and higher sustained frame rates in demanding games. While the iQOO charges slightly faster, the K60 Pro’s overall package is more future-proof.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo iQOO Neo7 Racing Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42
5G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
 CDMA2000 1x CDMA2000 1x
Launch
Announced2022, December 292022, December 27
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, January 05Available. Released 2023, January 01
Body
Dimensions164.8 x 76.9 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm or 8.9 mm
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight197 g / 202 g (6.95 oz)201 g or 205 g (7.09 oz)
Display
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density)1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density)
Size6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio)6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak)OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 740
OSAndroid 13, OriginOS 3Android 13, MIUI 14
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM
 UFS 3.1UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1 - 128GB only
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaColor spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Single16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm-
Triple50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm16 MP, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30/60/120fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
 24-bit/192kHz audio24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless5.3, A2DP, LE
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC
RadioNoUnspecified
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging120W wired, 50% in 8 min120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 19 min 30W wireless
Type5000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsOrange, Black, BlueBlack, White, Mint, Champion Black
ModelsV2232A22127RK46C
PriceAbout 380 EURAbout 460 EUR

vivo iQOO Neo7 Racing

  • Potentially faster initial charging speed (0-50%)
  • May be available at a lower price point
  • Strong performance for its price bracket

  • Older Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
  • Lacks wireless charging
  • Potentially lower long-term performance

Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro

  • Significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
  • Includes 30W wireless charging
  • Improved power efficiency for longer battery life

  • May be slightly more expensive
  • Wired charging takes slightly longer for a full charge

Display Comparison

Neither device’s display specifications are provided, but given their market positioning, we can infer similarities. Both likely feature AMOLED panels with high refresh rates (120Hz or higher). The Redmi K60 Pro, being the newer model, may benefit from slightly improved color accuracy and peak brightness. However, the real difference will likely be in software optimizations for display calibration. Without specific data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the K60 Pro’s newer chipset could allow for more advanced display processing.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is challenging. However, Xiaomi’s Redmi K-series typically emphasizes camera performance, and the K60 Pro likely features a more advanced sensor and image processing pipeline than the iQOO Neo7 Racing. The Redmi K60 Pro may also benefit from improved computational photography algorithms powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP. We can expect the K60 Pro to deliver better dynamic range and low-light performance. The iQOO Neo7 Racing will likely still produce good images, but the K60 Pro is expected to have a clear edge in image quality.

Performance

The core differentiator here is the chipset. The Redmi K60 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the iQOO Neo7 Racing’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The Gen 2 utilizes the newer Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, compared to the X2 in the 8+ Gen 1 at 3.19 GHz. Furthermore, the Gen 2 features a revised CPU cluster with more efficient Cortex-A715 and A710 cores. This translates to approximately 15-20% better CPU performance and a substantial improvement in GPU capabilities. The K60 Pro’s LPDDR5x RAM further enhances memory bandwidth, contributing to smoother multitasking. While the iQOO Neo7 Racing remains a capable performer, the K60 Pro offers a more future-proof and responsive experience.

Battery Life

Both phones feature 120W wired charging, but the Redmi K60 Pro adds 30W wireless charging, a significant convenience factor. While the iQOO Neo7 Racing claims a 50% charge in 8 minutes, the K60 Pro achieves a full charge in 19 minutes. This suggests a slightly faster initial charging rate for the iQOO, but the K60 Pro’s overall charging curve is optimized for a complete fill. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s improved power efficiency also contributes to better battery life in the K60 Pro, offsetting any potential capacity differences.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo iQOO Neo7 Racing if you prioritize the absolute fastest wired charging speeds and are looking for a strong performer at a potentially lower price point. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their battery and enjoy mobile gaming but aren’t necessarily demanding the highest possible frame rates. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro if you value long-term performance, a more efficient chipset, and the added convenience of wireless charging. This phone is best suited for power users, gamers seeking consistently high frame rates, and those who want a device that will remain capable for years to come.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Redmi K60 Pro get noticeably warmer than the 8+ Gen 1 in the iQOO Neo7 Racing during extended gaming sessions?
While both chipsets are efficient, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is designed for sustained performance with improved thermal management. It's likely to maintain higher clock speeds for longer periods, potentially resulting in slightly warmer temperatures, but this is a trade-off for consistently higher frame rates and smoother gameplay. Xiaomi's cooling solutions in the K60 Pro are also likely more advanced.
❓ Is the 30W wireless charging on the Redmi K60 Pro significantly slower than the 120W wired charging on both phones?
Yes, 30W wireless charging is considerably slower than 120W wired charging. However, it offers a convenient top-up option, especially overnight. A full wireless charge will take considerably longer, but it eliminates the need for cables and reduces wear on the charging port. The 120W wired charging remains the fastest way to replenish the battery on both devices.
❓ Will the iQOO Neo7 Racing struggle with demanding games released in 2024?
The iQOO Neo7 Racing will likely be able to run most games released in 2024, but it may require lower graphics settings to maintain stable frame rates. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is still a capable chipset, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Redmi K60 Pro offers a significant performance advantage, ensuring a smoother experience with future titles.