iQOO Neo7 Racing vs Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity): Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo iQOO Neo7 Racing emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, coupled with blazing-fast 120W charging, delivers a superior gaming and power-user experience. While the Xiaomi 12 Pro offers a refined design, the iQOO’s performance edge is difficult to ignore.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo7 Racing | Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 29 | 2022, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 05 | Available. Released 2022, July 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm | 163.6 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g / 202 g (6.95 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~521 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 109.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 15mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Orange, Black, Blue | Gray, Blue |
| Models | V2232A | 2207122MC |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 570 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo7 Racing
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Superior thermal management with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Potentially higher gaming performance
- Software experience may be less refined than Xiaomi's MIUI
- Camera system details are unknown
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity)
- Polished MIUI software experience
- Potentially more accurate display calibration
- Wider charging compatibility (PD3.0, QC4)
- Slower 67W charging
- Dimensity 9000+ may throttle under sustained load
- Potentially less powerful GPU
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize 4nm chipsets, but the display differences are less pronounced. While specific display specs (resolution, refresh rate) aren't provided, both are expected to offer high-quality panels. The Xiaomi 12 Pro likely benefits from Xiaomi’s established display calibration expertise, potentially offering more accurate colors out of the box. However, the iQOO Neo7 Racing’s focus on gaming suggests a potentially higher touch sampling rate, crucial for responsiveness. Bezels are likely comparable, given both phones target a premium aesthetic.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is challenging. However, both phones likely feature capable main sensors. The Xiaomi 12 Pro, given Xiaomi’s history, likely emphasizes computational photography and image processing for vibrant, shareable photos. The iQOO Neo7 Racing, geared towards a younger audience, might prioritize speed and dynamic range. The absence of information on sensor size and OIS makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s brand reputation suggests a more refined camera experience. We can safely assume both will have a standard array of lenses, but the quality of the 2MP macro lens on either device is likely minimal.
Performance
The core of the battle lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Neo7 Racing’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) and the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s Dimensity 9000+ (4nm) are both high-end performers. The Dimensity 9000+ boasts a slightly higher peak CPU clock speed (3.20 GHz vs 3.19 GHz), but the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known for its superior thermal efficiency. This means the iQOO Neo7 Racing is less likely to throttle under sustained load, making it ideal for extended gaming sessions. The iQOO also benefits from potentially faster RAM speeds (likely LPDDR5x), further enhancing performance. The CPU core configuration is similar – both feature 1x Cortex-X2, 3x Cortex-A710, and 4x Cortex-A510 – but the Snapdragon’s Adreno GPU generally outperforms the Mali-G710 MC10 in the Dimensity 9000+ in graphically intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The iQOO Neo7 Racing’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, promising a 50% charge in just 8 minutes. This significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s 67W charging, which, while still fast, takes considerably longer to reach full capacity. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the iQOO’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The Xiaomi 12 Pro supports PD3.0 and QC4, offering broader compatibility, but the iQOO’s sheer charging speed is a major advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo7 Racing if you prioritize gaming performance, need the fastest possible charging speeds, and demand a phone that can handle sustained workloads without significant throttling. Buy the Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) if you prefer a more polished software experience, a slightly more premium build quality, and value a balanced approach to performance and battery life over absolute speed.