The iQOO Neo series has consistently delivered impressive performance at competitive prices. Today, we're pitting the latest iQOO Neo7 Racing against its predecessor, the iQOO Neo 6, to see which offers the best value for gamers and mobile enthusiasts. Both phones pack powerful processors, but significant differences exist.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO Neo7 Racing takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and blazing-fast 120W charging. However, the Neo 6 remains a compelling option for those prioritizing exceptional battery life and a slightly more refined display, especially at a potentially lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 29 | 2022, May 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 05 | Available. Released 2022, May 31 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm | 163 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g / 202 g (6.95 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min | 80W wired, 50% in 12 min, 100% in 32 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Orange, Black, Blue | Dark Nova, Cyber Rage |
| Models | V2232A | I2126 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 97h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.0 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 627246 (v8), 730223 (v9)
GeekBench: 3076 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo7 Racing
- Significantly faster performance (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Likely improved camera (based on chipset)
- Modern 4nm process
- Battery life potentially less than Neo 6
- Display brightness not specified
- Potentially higher price
vivo iQOO Neo 6
- Exceptional battery life (97h endurance rating)
- Excellent display contrast (infinite)
- More affordable price (likely)
- Solid performance (Snapdragon 870)
- Slower charging speed (80W)
- Older chipset (Snapdragon 870)
- Potentially less refined camera
Display Comparison
The iQOO Neo 6 boasts a measured peak brightness of 772 nits and an infinite contrast ratio, suggesting excellent visibility and vibrant colors. The Neo7 Racing's display, while likely very good, lacks specific brightness measurements in the provided specs. Both likely feature AMOLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates, offering smooth scrolling and gaming experiences. The Neo 6's contrast advantage is a subtle but noticeable win.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are described as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are missing. Generally, the Neo 7 Racing is expected to have a slightly improved camera system due to the newer chipset and potential software optimizations. However, without specific sensor details and sample images, a definitive comparison is difficult.
Performance
This is where the Neo7 Racing truly shines. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a substantial upgrade over the Snapdragon 870. Expect significantly faster app loading times, smoother gameplay, and better overall responsiveness in demanding tasks. The Neo 7 Racing's 4nm process also contributes to improved efficiency compared to the Neo 6's 7nm process.
Battery Life
The iQOO Neo 6 holds a clear advantage in battery endurance, boasting an impressive 97-hour rating. While the Neo7 Racing's battery capacity is likely similar, the faster charging speed (120W vs 80W) allows it to replenish the battery much quicker. The Neo 6's longevity is a significant selling point for users who prioritize all-day battery life.
Buying Guide
The iQOO Neo7 Racing is ideal for gamers and power users who demand the absolute best performance and rapid charging. The iQOO Neo 6 is a great choice for users who prioritize long battery life, a good display, and a more budget-friendly price, while still enjoying solid performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 significantly faster than the Snapdragon 870?
Yes, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a substantial performance boost over the Snapdragon 870, particularly in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing.
❓ Which phone is better for battery life?
The iQOO Neo 6 is the clear winner for battery life, boasting a 97-hour endurance rating. The Neo7 Racing's charging is faster, but its overall battery longevity might be slightly less.
