Realme GT Neo 5 240W vs. vivo iQOO Neo7 Racing: The Ultimate Speed Test
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is the clear winner. While both phones share the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, the GT Neo 5’s groundbreaking 240W charging – achieving 50% charge in just 4 minutes – is a game-changer for those constantly on the move. The iQOO Neo7 Racing remains a strong contender, but the charging speed difference is too significant to ignore.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo7 Racing | Realme GT Neo 5 240W |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 29 | 2023, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 05 | Available. Released 2023, February 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g / 202 g (6.95 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| - | Illuminated RGB (on the back) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min | 240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Orange, Black, Blue | Purple, Black, White |
| Models | V2232A | RMX3708 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 440 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo7 Racing
- Potentially more refined software experience (vivo's Funtouch OS)
- Slightly higher clocked efficiency cores (Cortex-A510)
- Balanced performance and battery life
- Significantly slower charging speed (120W vs 240W)
- May lack the peak brightness of the Realme GT Neo 5's display
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- Revolutionary 240W charging – fastest in the market
- Likely brighter display
- Aggressive performance focus
- Potentially less optimized software (Realme UI)
- Slightly lower clocked efficiency cores (Cortex-A510)
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize AMOLED panels, but detailed specifications like resolution and refresh rate are missing. However, given their market positioning, we can expect both to offer at least a 120Hz refresh rate. The Realme GT Neo 5’s display is likely to be brighter, given Realme’s recent focus on display quality. The iQOO Neo7 Racing may prioritize color accuracy for gaming, but without specific data, this remains speculative. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, reflecting current design trends.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are unavailable, but both phones likely feature a primary sensor around 50MP. The Realme GT Neo 5 may benefit from Realme’s image processing algorithms, known for vibrant colors. The iQOO Neo7 Racing might lean towards a more natural color profile. Without knowing sensor sizes or the presence of OIS, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The inclusion of a usable ultrawide lens is expected on both, while the typical 2MP macro lens is likely present but of limited utility.
Performance
The core of both phones is the Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset. However, a subtle difference exists in the Cortex-A510 core clock speed: the iQOO Neo7 Racing features 2.0 GHz cores, while the Realme GT Neo 5 has 1.80 GHz cores. This difference is unlikely to be noticeable in everyday use, but could translate to slightly better multi-core performance on the iQOO. Both phones likely utilize LPDDR5X RAM for fast memory access. Thermal management will be crucial; the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 can throttle under sustained load, and the effectiveness of each phone’s cooling system will determine long-term gaming performance.
Battery Life
This is where the Realme GT Neo 5 240W truly shines. While battery capacity is not specified, the 240W wired charging is a massive advantage, achieving 50% charge in just 4 minutes and 100% in 10 minutes. The iQOO Neo7 Racing’s 120W charging is still fast, reaching 50% in 8 minutes, but it’s significantly slower. The faster charging of the Realme GT Neo 5 effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery capacity, offering more usable uptime for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo7 Racing if you prioritize a slightly more refined software experience and a balanced approach to performance and battery life. It’s ideal for users who want a solid all-rounder without needing the absolute fastest charging. Buy the Realme GT Neo 5 240W if you absolutely need the quickest possible recharge times and are willing to trade off potentially slightly less optimized software for that speed. This is the phone for power users and those who frequently find themselves with a critically low battery.