iQOO Neo7 vs Xiaomi 12 Pro: A Deep Dive into Dimensity 9000+ Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the iQOO Neo7 emerges as the stronger choice. Its blazing-fast 120W charging significantly reduces downtime, a crucial advantage for those constantly on the move. While the Xiaomi 12 Pro offers a more refined design, the iQOO Neo7’s performance and charging capabilities provide better overall value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo7 (China) | Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 20 | 2022, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 31 | Available. Released 2022, July 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm | 163.6 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g / 202 g (6.95 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~521 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 109.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 15mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 9 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Orange, Black, Blue | Gray, Blue |
| Models | V2231A | 2207122MC |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 570 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo7 (China)
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Potentially more aggressive cooling for gaming
- Likely better value for money
- Potentially less refined design
- Software experience may be less polished
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity)
- Premium build quality and design
- Potentially better camera system
- Wider charger compatibility (PD3.0, QC4)
- Significantly slower 67W charging
- Higher price point
- Potential for MIUI bloatware
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize AMOLED panels, but detailed specifications like peak brightness and refresh rate are missing. However, given the iQOO brand’s gaming focus, it’s reasonable to expect a high refresh rate (likely 120Hz) on both. The Xiaomi 12 Pro, being positioned as a flagship, likely boasts slightly better color accuracy and potentially a higher peak brightness for HDR content. Bezels are likely comparable, with the Xiaomi 12 Pro potentially having a marginally more refined aesthetic.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Xiaomi 12 Pro, as a flagship, likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The iQOO Neo7 will likely focus on delivering good value, potentially sacrificing some image quality for price. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely inconsequential; image quality from such sensors is typically underwhelming. OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the main sensor of the Xiaomi 12 Pro would be a significant advantage for low-light photography and video recording.
Performance
The core performance is virtually identical, as both phones are equipped with the Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) chipset featuring the same CPU configuration: 1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510. The 4nm process node ensures excellent power efficiency. Thermal management will be key; while the chipset is capable, sustained performance will depend on the cooling solutions implemented by each manufacturer. The iQOO Neo7, geared towards gaming, may have a more aggressive cooling system. Both likely utilize LPDDR5X RAM, contributing to fast application loading and multitasking.
Battery Life
This is where the iQOO Neo7 truly shines. Its 120W wired charging capability allows for a 50% charge in just 9 minutes, drastically reducing downtime. The Xiaomi 12 Pro’s 67W charging, while still fast, is significantly slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the iQOO Neo7 effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The Xiaomi 12 Pro supports PD3.0 and QC4, offering broader compatibility with chargers, but doesn’t match the sheer speed of the iQOO’s solution.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo7 (China) if you prioritize rapid charging, extended gaming sessions without battery anxiety, and a more aggressive price point. Buy the Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) if you prefer a more premium build quality, a potentially more polished software experience (depending on MIUI version), and aren't as reliant on ultra-fast charging.