vivo iQOO Neo7 vs iQOO 9 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO 9 Pro offers a more premium experience with its superior display, wireless charging, and slightly faster wired charging. However, the iQOO Neo7 provides excellent performance at a potentially lower price point, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious gamers and power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo7 (China) | vivo iQOO 9 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 20 | 2022, January 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 31 | Available. Released 2022, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Panda Glass), aluminum frame, glass back or aramid fiber back |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm | 164.8 x 75.2 x 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g / 202 g (6.95 oz) | 204 g or 210 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, Funtouch 12 (International), OriginOS Ocean (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 (V6) | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED lash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 60mm (telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.3, 15mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 9 min | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min, 100% in 20 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Orange, Black, Blue | Legend (White w/ BMW M branding), Dark Cruise, Orange |
| Models | V2231A | V2172A, I2022 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 630 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 862324 (v8), 997948 (v9) GeekBench: 3708 (v5.1) GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo7 (China)
- Excellent performance for the price
- Incredibly fast 120W wired charging
- Efficient Dimensity 9000+ chipset
- Good value
- Lacks wireless charging
- Potentially less refined camera system
- Display not as bright as the 9 Pro
vivo iQOO 9 Pro
- Premium display with high brightness and contrast
- Wireless charging capabilities (50W)
- Reverse wireless charging
- Potentially better camera system
- Refined overall experience
- Higher price point
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 can be less efficient than Dimensity 9000+ in some cases
Display Comparison
The iQOO 9 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display at 1000 nits (measured) and an impressive infinite contrast ratio, offering a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. The Neo7's display is still good, but lacks the same level of peak brightness and contrast. Expect richer colors and better visibility in sunlight on the 9 Pro.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a key differentiator. While both offer Photo/Video capabilities, the iQOO 9 Pro is expected to have a more advanced camera system with better image processing and potentially improved low-light performance. Specific camera specs are missing, but the 9 Pro's higher tier positioning suggests a superior camera experience.
Performance
Both phones pack powerful chipsets. The iQOO Neo7 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9000+, while the iQOO 9 Pro features the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. While both are excellent, the Dimensity 9000+ generally offers slightly better efficiency and gaming performance in some scenarios. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is still a powerhouse and provides a smooth and responsive user experience.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with an endurance rating of 97 hours. The iQOO 9 Pro also includes 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, providing added convenience. The Neo7 relies solely on 120W wired charging, which is incredibly fast but lacks wireless charging options.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Neo7 is ideal for gamers and users prioritizing raw performance and fast charging on a budget. The iQOO 9 Pro is better suited for those who value a premium display, wireless charging capabilities, and a more refined overall experience, even if it comes at a higher cost.