iQOO Neo7 vs Oppo Find X5 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and charging speed above all else, the iQOO Neo7 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9000+ offers competitive performance, and the 120W charging is significantly faster than the Find X5 Pro’s 80W. However, the Oppo Find X5 Pro delivers a more polished experience with its superior display and potentially more consistent camera performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo7 (China) | Oppo Find X5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 20 | 2022, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 31 | Available. Released 2022, March 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm | 163.7 x 73.9 x 8.5 or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 197 g / 202 g (6.95 oz) | 218 g or 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - GlobalOcta-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - China |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - GlobalMediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) - China |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 730 - GlobalMali-G710 MC10 - China |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS (3-axis sensor-shift, 2-axis lens-shift) 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Oppo Find X5 Pro Dimensity model has no MariSilicon X image chip, 5-axis OIS and Hasselblad’s color calibration | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 9 min | 80W wired, PD, 50% in 12 min 50W wireless, 100% in 47 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Orange, Black, Blue | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White, Blue (eco leather) |
| Models | V2231A | PFEM10, CPH2305, PFFM20 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | € 449.00 / $ 430.24 / £ 1,049.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1012896 (v9) GeekBench: 3433 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo7 (China)
- Significantly faster 120W wired charging
- Potentially better sustained performance due to Dimensity 9000+ thermal efficiency
- Likely optimized for gaming with higher clock speeds
- Missing display specifications (brightness, panel type)
- Limited camera information
- No wireless charging
Oppo Find X5 Pro
- Brighter display (762 nits)
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Potentially more refined camera image processing
- Slower charging speeds (80W wired, 50W wireless)
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 prone to thermal throttling
- Higher price point (likely)
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X5 Pro boasts a brighter display, measured at 762 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the iQOO Neo7. While the iQOO Neo7’s display specs are missing, Oppo’s panel benefits from an infinite contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks and vibrant colors. Both devices likely utilize AMOLED technology, but the Find X5 Pro’s higher peak brightness will be noticeable in direct sunlight. The Find X5 Pro’s display is geared towards media consumption and outdoor visibility, while the iQOO Neo7 likely prioritizes refresh rate and responsiveness for gaming.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. The Oppo Find X5 Pro’s camera is described as ‘Photo / Video’ without specifics, suggesting a balanced approach. The iQOO Neo7’s camera specs are also absent, making a direct comparison difficult. Given Oppo’s history, the Find X5 Pro likely prioritizes image processing and color science for more natural-looking photos. The iQOO Neo7 may lean towards a more vibrant and contrasty aesthetic, appealing to a different user preference. Without sensor size or aperture details, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance.
Performance
The iQOO Neo7’s Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4nm) and the Oppo Find X5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) are both high-end chipsets. The Dimensity 9000+ features a slightly higher clocked Cortex-X2 core (3.20 GHz vs 3.00 GHz), potentially offering a marginal edge in single-core performance. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is known to be more prone to thermal throttling under sustained load. The China variant of the Find X5 Pro uses the Dimensity 9000, which is more thermally efficient. Both phones utilize the same Cortex-A710 and A510 core configuration, meaning multi-core performance will be comparable. The iQOO Neo7’s focus on gaming suggests optimized thermal management to sustain peak performance for longer durations.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X5 Pro has an endurance rating of 101 hours, indicating solid battery life. Its 80W wired charging reaches 50% in 12 minutes, while 50W wireless charging takes 47 minutes to fully charge. The iQOO Neo7’s 120W wired charging is significantly faster, reaching 50% in just 9 minutes. While the iQOO Neo7’s battery capacity is unknown, the faster charging speed mitigates concerns about a potentially smaller battery. The Find X5 Pro offers the convenience of wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the iQOO Neo7.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo7 (China) if you need uncompromising performance for mobile gaming, require the fastest possible charging speeds, and are comfortable with a potentially less refined software experience. Buy the Oppo Find X5 Pro if you prefer a premium build quality, a brighter and more color-accurate display, and a more versatile camera system with a focus on overall image quality and wireless charging convenience.