iQOO Neo7 vs Honor Magic4 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak gaming performance and the absolute fastest charging speeds, the iQOO Neo7 is the clear winner. However, the Honor Magic4 Pro offers a more holistic experience with a potentially more refined camera and comparable battery life, making it ideal for everyday users and content creators.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo7 (China) | Honor Magic4 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 20 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 31 | Available. Released 2022, April 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm | 163.6 x 74.7 x 9.1 mm or 9.2 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g / 202 g (6.95 oz) | 209 g / 215 g (7.37 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1312 x 2848 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 113.7 cm2 (~93.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, Magic UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 12 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1.22µm TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.5", AF 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom TOF 3D (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10-bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 12 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1.22µm TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit audio stereo recording | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 9 min | 100W wired, 100% in 30 min 100W wireless, 50% in 15 min Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Orange, Black, Blue | Black, White, Cyan, Gold, Orange |
| Models | V2231A | LGE-NX9, LGE-N49B, LGE-N19B, LGE-AN10, GBD-NX9 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | € 469.41 / £ 397.48 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 82h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 980755 (v9) GeekBench: 3512 (v5.1) GFXBench: 59fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo7 (China)
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Potentially superior single-core performance with Dimensity 9000+
- Likely optimized for gaming with efficient thermal management
- Limited camera details available
- Battery life potentially lower than Magic4 Pro
Honor Magic4 Pro
- Excellent 82-hour battery endurance
- 100W wired and 100W wireless charging
- Refined camera system for photo and video
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 prone to thermal throttling
- Slower wired charging compared to iQOO Neo7
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic4 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 957 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the iQOO Neo7 (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize high refresh rate panels, the Magic4 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) hints at superior black levels. The iQOO Neo7’s display specifications are less detailed, making a direct comparison difficult, but its focus on gaming suggests a high refresh rate is present. The absence of LTPO information for the iQOO Neo7 means it may not dynamically adjust refresh rates as efficiently as the Magic4 Pro, potentially impacting battery life.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. The Honor Magic4 Pro’s camera is marketed for both photo and video, suggesting a well-rounded approach. Without specific sensor size or aperture details for the iQOO Neo7, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The Magic4 Pro’s emphasis on camera capabilities suggests a more sophisticated image processing pipeline and potentially better dynamic range. The absence of details regarding the iQOO Neo7’s camera features makes it difficult to determine its strengths beyond general smartphone photography.
Performance
Both devices employ 4nm chipsets, but the Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ in the iQOO Neo7 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the Honor Magic4 Pro differ in architecture. The iQOO Neo7’s Dimensity 9000+ features a slightly higher clocked Cortex-X2 core (3.20 GHz vs 3.00 GHz), potentially offering a marginal edge in single-core performance. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s Adreno 730 GPU is a strong contender. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is known to be more prone to thermal throttling under sustained load, while the Dimensity 9000+ generally exhibits better thermal efficiency. Both phones utilize octa-core CPUs with similar Cortex-A710 and A510 configurations, meaning multi-core performance will be competitive. The iQOO Neo7’s gaming focus likely benefits from optimized software and cooling solutions.
Battery Life
The Honor Magic4 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 82 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the iQOO Neo7’s battery capacity is unknown, its 120W wired charging significantly outperforms the Magic4 Pro’s 100W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in just 9 minutes compared to the Magic4 Pro’s 30 minutes for a full charge. The Magic4 Pro further differentiates itself with 100W wireless charging (50% in 15 minutes) and reverse wireless/wired charging capabilities, offering greater versatility. The iQOO Neo7’s focus is clearly on minimizing downtime through incredibly fast wired charging, while the Magic4 Pro prioritizes overall battery longevity and charging convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo7 (China) if you need uncompromising gaming performance, require the fastest possible charging (reaching 50% in just 9 minutes), and prioritize raw CPU/GPU power. Buy the Honor Magic4 Pro if you prefer a more balanced experience with a strong emphasis on camera quality, longer battery endurance (82h rating), and the convenience of wireless charging options, including reverse wireless charging.