iQOO Neo6 SE vs Motorola Edge 30 Pro: A Detailed Performance and Value Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and rapid charging, the iQOO Neo6 SE emerges as the stronger contender. While the Motorola Edge 30 Pro boasts the newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, its thermal management and slightly slower charging are offset by the iQOO’s efficient chipset and 80W charging capabilities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo6 SE | Motorola Edge 30 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 2, 5, 7, 12, 25, 26, 29, 30, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 06 | 2022, January 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 11 | Available. Released 2022, March 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 163.1 x 76 x 8.8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ready For support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 12 min, 100% in 32 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Orange, Gradient | Cosmos Blue, Stardust White |
| Models | V2199A | XT2201-1 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | € 475.45 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 80h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 941895 (v9) GeekBench: 3658 (v5.1) GFXBench: 78fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo6 SE
- Significantly faster 80W wired charging
- More efficient Snapdragon 870 for sustained performance
- Potentially better value for money
- Lacks wireless charging
- Camera specifications are unknown
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
- Latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Higher peak display brightness
- Potential for thermal throttling
- Slower wired charging compared to iQOO
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Pro features a display capable of reaching 685 nits of peak brightness, offering excellent visibility in outdoor conditions. While the iQOO Neo6 SE’s display specs aren’t provided, it’s likely to be slightly dimmer. The Edge 30 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a typical OLED panel, but lacks specifics like refresh rate or HDR support. The absence of PWM frequency data for either phone makes it difficult to assess flicker-related eye strain, but the Edge 30 Pro’s higher peak brightness could be beneficial for users in bright environments.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is impossible. It’s reasonable to assume the Motorola Edge 30 Pro, being the more premium device, may feature a more sophisticated camera system, but this remains speculative. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device would likely offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Edge 30 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) offers theoretical performance advantages over the iQOO Neo6 SE’s Snapdragon 870 (7nm). However, the 8 Gen 1 is known to run hotter, potentially leading to thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. The iQOO Neo6 SE’s Snapdragon 870, while older, is remarkably efficient and maintains consistent performance for longer. The Edge 30 Pro’s CPU configuration – 1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510 – provides a peak performance boost, but the iQOO’s 1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585, 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585, and 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585 is still very competitive. RAM specifications are missing for both, but LPDDR5 is expected on both devices.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 30 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 80 hours, suggesting a decent battery life. However, this is heavily dependent on usage patterns. The iQOO Neo6 SE’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 80W wired charging significantly outperforms the Edge 30 Pro’s 68W charging. The iQOO can reach 50% charge in just 12 minutes and 100% in 32 minutes, while the Edge 30 Pro takes 15 minutes for 50% and 35 minutes for a full charge. The Edge 30 Pro also adds 15W wireless and 5W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the iQOO.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo6 SE if you need a phone that consistently delivers high frame rates in gaming and prioritizes incredibly fast charging without breaking the bank. It’s ideal for users who value performance-per-dollar. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Pro if you prefer a more feature-rich experience with wireless charging and a potentially brighter display, and are willing to pay a premium for the latest Snapdragon chipset, understanding that sustained performance may be limited by thermal throttling.