The mid-range 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo iQOO Neo6 SE and Honor Magic4 Lite represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. However, they take distinctly different approaches. The iQOO Neo6 SE prioritizes raw processing power with its Snapdragon 870, while the Honor Magic4 Lite focuses on a balanced experience with a more efficient Snapdragon 695 and a focus on endurance. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and gaming, the vivo iQOO Neo6 SE is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 delivers significantly faster processing speeds and a smoother gaming experience. While the Honor Magic4 Lite offers comparable battery life and a decent display, it can't match the iQOO's overall power.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 06 | 2022, March 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 11 | Available. Released 2022, April 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 166 x 75.8 x 8 mm (6.54 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5 |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 12 min, 100% in 32 min | 66W wired |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Orange, Gradient | Titanium Silver, Ocean Blue, Midnight Black |
| Models | V2199A | ANY-LX1, ANY-LX2, ANY-LX3 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 180 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1229:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-34.0 LUFS (Poor)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 387218 (v9)
GeekBench: 1906 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo6 SE
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 870)
- Faster 80W charging
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Battery capacity not specified
- Display details are limited
Honor Magic4 Lite
- Excellent 104-hour battery endurance
- Decent 66W charging
- Solid display contrast ratio
- Slower processor (Snapdragon 695)
- Less capable GPU for gaming
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 1229:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar visual pop. However, the Honor Magic4 Lite’s measured 535 nits of peak brightness is the only display spec provided, while the iQOO Neo6 SE’s display characteristics are not detailed. Given iQOO’s focus on gaming, it’s reasonable to expect a higher refresh rate and potentially better color accuracy on the Neo6 SE, though this remains unconfirmed. The lack of information on the iQOO’s panel makes a definitive display comparison difficult, but the Magic4 Lite’s brightness is a solid baseline.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a meaningful camera comparison is impossible. It’s likely both phones offer adequate performance for casual photography, but the iQOO Neo6 SE, positioned as a gaming phone, may prioritize image processing for capturing fast-action shots. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a standout camera performer.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The iQOO Neo6 SE’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Honor Magic4 Lite’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The 870 features a Kryo 585 core clocked at 3.2 GHz, compared to the 695’s 2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores. This translates to a noticeable difference in application launch times, multitasking responsiveness, and gaming performance. The 870’s more powerful GPU will handle graphically demanding games with higher frame rates and settings. While the 6nm process of the 695 offers better efficiency, it doesn’t compensate for the architectural and clock speed advantages of the 870.
Battery Life
The Honor Magic4 Lite boasts an endurance rating of 104 hours, indicating excellent battery life. The iQOO Neo6 SE’s battery capacity is not specified, but it compensates with significantly faster 80W wired charging – achieving 50% charge in 12 minutes and 100% in 32 minutes. The Magic4 Lite’s 66W charging is respectable, but slower. This means the iQOO Neo6 SE can quickly top up its battery, mitigating any potential capacity disadvantage. The 104-hour endurance rating of the Magic4 Lite suggests a larger battery, but the iQOO’s charging speed offers a different kind of convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo6 SE if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games, multitasking, and resource-intensive applications without slowdown. It's ideal for gamers, content creators, and power users. Buy the Honor Magic4 Lite if you prefer a phone with a focus on all-day battery life and a more streamlined user experience, and your primary use cases are everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light media consumption.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Honor Magic4 Lite struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is a mid-range chip and will likely require significant graphics settings reductions and may still experience frame drops in graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact. It's better suited for less demanding titles.
❓ How does the 80W charging on the iQOO Neo6 SE compare to typical fast charging standards?
80W charging is exceptionally fast. It's significantly quicker than the 25W or 33W charging commonly found in this price range, allowing you to quickly replenish the battery during short breaks. The iQOO Neo6 SE can reach 100% charge in just 32 minutes.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on both phones a cause for concern?
Yes, it suggests that neither phone is a primary focus for camera enthusiasts. Expect adequate performance for casual snapshots, but don't anticipate flagship-level image quality or advanced features.
❓ Does the iQOO Neo6 SE have any features specifically geared towards gaming beyond the processor?
While not explicitly stated in the provided specs, iQOO phones often include gaming-centric features like dedicated game modes, optimized touch sampling rates, and improved thermal management. Further research into the Neo6 SE's software features is recommended to confirm these capabilities.
