vivo iQOO Neo6 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ boasts significantly faster charging and a potentially better camera system. However, the iQOO Neo6’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 offers a raw performance edge for gaming and demanding tasks. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities: speed or power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International, China |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 13 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 20 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 163 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm | 162.9 x 76 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 194 / 197.2 g (6.84 oz) | 208.4 g (7.34 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6877V Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 20-80% in 19 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min (advertised) |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Arctic White, Iceberg Blue, Obsidian Black, Trend edition |
| Models | V2196A | 22101316UCP, 22101316UG |
| Price | About 400 EUR | $ 348.00 / £ 439.00 / € 399.00 / ₹ 29,949 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.7 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 498710 (v9) GeekBench: 2208 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
- Flagship-level performance (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1)
- Fast 80W charging
- High refresh rate display (likely 120Hz)
- Competitive price
- Camera may not be as good as the Redmi Note 12 Pro+
- Charging speed slower than the competition
- Availability limited to China
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+
- Incredibly fast 120W charging
- Potentially superior camera system (200MP rumored)
- Long battery life (88h endurance rating)
- Excellent display quality
- Dimensity 1080 chipset less powerful than Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Performance may not be ideal for demanding games
- Software experience can be inconsistent
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent image quality. The iQOO Neo6 likely has a high refresh rate (typically 120Hz) for smoother scrolling and gaming. Screen size and resolution are likely similar, around 6.6-6.7 inches and FHD+.
Camera Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is expected to have a more advanced camera system, potentially featuring a higher resolution main sensor (rumored 200MP) and improved image processing. The iQOO Neo6 likely has a competent camera setup, but it's unlikely to match the Redmi Note 12 Pro+'s capabilities, especially in low-light conditions. Video recording capabilities should be comparable.
Performance
The iQOO Neo6’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is a flagship-level chipset, providing significantly more processing power than the Dimensity 1080 in the Redmi Note 12 Pro+. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better performance in demanding games. While the Dimensity 1080 is still a capable chip, it won't match the iQOO Neo6's raw power.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ takes a clear lead in this category with its 120W charging, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. The iQOO Neo6's 80W charging is still fast, but not as impressive. Both phones likely have similar battery capacities (around 4500-5000mAh), but the Redmi Note 12 Pro+'s charging speed gives it a significant advantage.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Neo6 is ideal for gamers and users who prioritize raw processing power and a smooth experience. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is a better choice for those who value incredibly fast charging, a potentially superior camera, and long battery life.