The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo iQOO Neo6 and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro are two contenders vying for your attention. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but which one truly delivers the best experience? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO Neo6 takes the crown for raw performance thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. However, the Poco X3 Pro boasts exceptional battery life and a surprisingly good display. If speed is your priority, the iQOO Neo6 wins; if longevity and value are key, the Poco X3 Pro remains a strong choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 13 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 20 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 / 197.2 g (6.84 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 20-80% in 19 min | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | V2196A | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 400 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
- Blazing-fast Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 performance
- 80W fast charging
- High refresh rate display (likely 120Hz/144Hz)
- Modern design
- Potentially shorter battery life than Poco X3 Pro
- May lack some of the Poco X3 Pro's camera versatility
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (112h endurance rating)
- Large, vibrant AMOLED display
- Competitive price
- Versatile camera system
- Slower Snapdragon 860 processor
- 33W charging is slower
- Older chipset
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 1401:1 contrast ratio, indicating excellent black levels and vibrant colors. The Poco X3 Pro has a 6.67-inch FHD+ AMOLED display, while the iQOO Neo6 typically features a 6.78-inch FHD+ AMOLED display with a higher refresh rate (likely 120Hz or 144Hz) for smoother scrolling and gaming. The iQOO Neo6's higher refresh rate gives it a noticeable edge in responsiveness.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a bit more nuanced. The Poco X3 Pro offers a quad-camera setup, while the iQOO Neo6 typically features a triple-camera system. While specific megapixel counts vary, both phones are capable of capturing decent photos and videos in good lighting conditions. The iQOO Neo6's image processing might be slightly more refined, but the Poco X3 Pro's versatility with its extra lens could be appealing to some.
Performance
This is where the iQOO Neo6 truly shines. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is significantly more powerful than the Poco X3 Pro's Snapdragon 860. Expect faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and significantly better performance in demanding games. The iQOO Neo6's 4nm process also contributes to improved efficiency compared to the Poco X3 Pro's 7nm process.
Battery Life
The Poco X3 Pro excels in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 112 hours. The iQOO Neo6, while still offering good battery life, doesn't quite match the Poco X3 Pro's longevity. However, the iQOO Neo6's 80W fast charging significantly reduces charging times, offsetting some of the battery life difference.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Neo6 is ideal for gamers and power users who demand top-tier performance and fast charging. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is a great option for those prioritizing battery life, a large display, and a budget-friendly price tag, even if it means sacrificing some processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the iQOO Neo6 worth the extra cost over the Poco X3 Pro?
If you prioritize performance and fast charging, the iQOO Neo6 is worth the investment. However, if battery life and a lower price are your top priorities, the Poco X3 Pro remains a compelling option.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The iQOO Neo6 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset.
