vivo iQOO Neo5 vs Motorola Edge 20 Pro: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 870 Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and potentially optimized gaming, the vivo iQOO Neo5 emerges as the winner. Its 66W charging dramatically reduces downtime, while the Edge 20 Pro counters with a slightly better endurance rating, though both share the same chipset.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo5 | Motorola Edge 20 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 16 | 2021, July 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 22 | Available. Released 2021, August 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 76.4 x 8.4 mm (6.43 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 185/190 g (depending on color) (6.53 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 for iQOO | Android 11, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/3.4, 126mm (periscope telephoto), 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 100% in 30 min | 30W wired |
| Type | 4400 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Midnight Blue, Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent Cloud |
| Models | V2055A | XT2153-1 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 330 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 112h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.2 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 711090 (v9) GeekBench: 3140 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo5
- 66W Superfast Charging: Significantly reduces charging time.
- Potential Gaming Optimization: iQOO's focus suggests better sustained performance.
- Value Proposition: Likely offers comparable performance at a lower price point.
- Missing Display Specs: Lack of information hinders a full display comparison.
- Camera Details Unknown: Difficult to assess camera quality without sensor details.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
- High Peak Brightness: 673 nits ensures good visibility outdoors.
- Longer Endurance: 112-hour rating suggests good battery life.
- Near-Stock Android: Motorola’s software is generally clean and bloatware-free.
- Slower Charging: 30W charging is significantly slower than the iQOO Neo5.
- Potential for Thermal Throttling: May prioritize stability over sustained peak performance.
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize the Snapdragon 870, meaning graphical performance will be similar, but the display experience differs. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 673 nits, suggesting better outdoor visibility. While the iQOO Neo5’s display specifications are not provided, the Edge 20 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) indicates a typical OLED panel. Without PWM frequency data for the iQOO Neo5, it’s difficult to assess potential eye strain differences, but the Edge 20 Pro’s higher brightness is a clear advantage in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. The absence of sensor size or aperture information makes a direct comparison difficult. The Edge 20 Pro’s marketing often highlights its camera prowess, suggesting a potentially more refined image processing pipeline. The iQOO Neo5, while likely capable, may prioritize speed and efficiency over ultimate image quality. Without further data, it’s reasonable to assume both offer competent camera systems, but the Edge 20 Pro may have a slight advantage based on brand positioning.
Performance
At the heart of both the vivo iQOO Neo5 and Motorola Edge 20 Pro lies the Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm). Both feature the same Octa-core CPU configuration (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585, 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585, 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585), guaranteeing comparable raw processing power. However, thermal management and software optimization are key differentiators. iQOO, known for its gaming focus, likely implements aggressive cooling and software tweaks to sustain peak performance for longer durations. The Edge 20 Pro, while capable, may prioritize thermal stability over sustained peak performance. RAM specifications are missing for both, but LPDDR5 is expected, with the iQOO potentially utilizing LPDDR5X for a slight edge.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro claims an endurance rating of 112 hours, a useful metric but dependent on usage patterns. The iQOO Neo5 counters with a significantly faster 66W wired charging capability, achieving a 100% charge in just 30 minutes. This is a substantial advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery. While the Edge 20 Pro’s 30W charging is adequate, it’s considerably slower. The iQOO Neo5’s faster charging effectively mitigates any potential battery capacity disadvantage, making it the more convenient option for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo5 if you need blazing-fast charging and anticipate heavy mobile gaming, valuing minimized downtime. Buy the Motorola Edge 20 Pro if you prioritize all-day battery life and a more balanced feature set, potentially benefiting from Motorola’s near-stock Android experience and slightly better measured display brightness.