iQOO Neo5 vs Asus ROG Phone 5s: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing value and sustained performance, the iQOO Neo5 emerges as the winner. While the ROG Phone 5s boasts a more powerful chipset, its thermal management and higher price point make it less appealing than the Neo5's efficient Snapdragon 870 and aggressive charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo5 | Asus ROG Phone 5s |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 - Version 1 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - Version 1 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Version 1 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 1400/150 Mbps, 5G 4 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Version 4 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 16 | 2021, August 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 22 | Available. Released 2021, August 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 76.4 x 8.4 mm (6.43 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) | 172.8 x 77.3 x 9.9 mm (6.80 x 3.04 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 238 g (8.40 oz) |
| - | RGB light panel (on the back) Pressure sensitive zones (Gaming triggers) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2448 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 for iQOO | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ROG UI |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 11mm, 125˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 24 MP, f/2.5, 27mm (wide), 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (2 amplifiers) |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 (side), USB Type-C 2.0 (bottom), OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 100% in 30 min | 65W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 70% in 30 min, 100% in 52 min 10W reverse wired |
| Type | 4400 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Phantom Black, Storm White |
| Models | V2055A | ZS676KS |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 1030 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo5
- Faster charging (30 mins to 100%)
- Potentially better thermal management due to 7nm process
- Likely better value for money
- Less powerful chipset than the ROG Phone 5s
- May lack advanced gaming features found on the ROG Phone 5s
Asus ROG Phone 5s
- More powerful Snapdragon 888+ chipset
- Potential for higher refresh rate display
- Reverse wireless charging capability
- Slower charging speed (52 mins to 100%)
- Higher price point
- More prone to thermal throttling
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, but based on market positioning, the ROG Phone 5s likely features a higher refresh rate panel (144Hz vs 120Hz) and potentially higher peak brightness. The ROG Phone line historically prioritizes display quality for gaming, with features like HDR10+ support being common. The iQOO Neo5, while still offering a quality display, likely focuses on cost optimization. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, but the ROG Phone 5s may have a slightly more refined design.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, but the ROG Phone series historically prioritizes gaming features over camera prowess. The iQOO Neo5, as a more mainstream device, likely offers a more balanced camera system. Expect the ROG Phone 5s to have a competent camera, but the iQOO Neo5 may deliver better image quality in everyday scenarios. Without sensor size or aperture information, a definitive comparison is impossible, but the iQOO Neo5 is likely to offer a more versatile camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Asus ROG Phone 5s utilizes the Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5nm), a significant upgrade over the iQOO Neo5’s Snapdragon 870 (7nm). The 888+’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.99 GHz, offers a performance advantage in single-core tasks and burst workloads. However, the 7nm process of the Snapdragon 870 generally translates to better thermal efficiency. The ROG Phone 5s, despite its more powerful chip, is more prone to thermal throttling under sustained load. Both devices feature octa-core CPUs, but the architectural differences – Cortex-A78 in the 888+ vs Kryo 585 in the 870 – impact performance characteristics. The ROG Phone 5s likely benefits from faster LPDDR5 RAM, further enhancing its performance, but the iQOO Neo5's RAM speed is not specified.
Battery Life
Both phones offer fast wired charging, with the iQOO Neo5 achieving 100% charge in 30 minutes with its 66W system. The ROG Phone 5s, with 65W charging, takes 52 minutes to reach 100%, and only 70% in 30 minutes. The ROG Phone 5s also includes 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the iQOO Neo5. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging speed of the iQOO Neo5 provides a more convenient user experience, offsetting any potential capacity difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo5 if you need a powerful gaming experience without breaking the bank, and prioritize consistent performance over absolute peak power. It's ideal for users who want fast charging and a balanced feature set. Buy the Asus ROG Phone 5s if you demand the absolute highest Android processing power, are willing to invest in gaming accessories, and don't mind potentially managing thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.