The iQOO Neo5 SE and the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The iQOO prioritizes raw processing power with its Snapdragon 870, while the Redmi focuses on a more balanced package with faster charging and a potentially more refined software experience. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and gaming, the iQOO Neo5 SE is the clear winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G offers a compelling alternative with its 67W charging and potentially more efficient Snapdragon 695, making it a better choice for everyday users who value battery life and convenience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 20 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 29 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, 650 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Aurora | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | V2157A | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 250 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo5 SE
- Significantly more powerful Snapdragon 870 processor
- Superior gaming performance
- Faster app loading and multitasking
- Slower charging speed (55W vs 67W)
- Potentially lower battery efficiency
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3 support
- Potentially better battery life due to 6nm Snapdragon 695
- More balanced overall package
- Noticeably weaker CPU and GPU performance
- Less capable for demanding games and applications
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature LCD panels (data not provided), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. Display quality details like resolution and refresh rate are missing, but the Snapdragon 870 in the iQOO Neo5 SE will ensure smoother animations and faster app loading, indirectly enhancing the perceived display experience. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s Snapdragon 695, being a 6nm chip, *may* offer slightly better power efficiency, potentially extending screen-on time.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the processing capabilities of the Snapdragon 870 in the iQOO Neo5 SE will allow for more complex image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s Snapdragon 695 will still be capable of producing good images, but will likely lack the same level of detail and processing finesse. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and OIS makes a definitive judgment impossible.
Performance
The iQOO Neo5 SE’s Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) is the dominant force here. Its octa-core configuration, peaking at 3.2 GHz, significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm). The 870 utilizes Kryo 585 cores, offering a substantial leap in CPU and GPU performance. This translates to faster gaming frame rates, quicker video editing, and a more responsive overall user experience. The 6nm process of the 695 is more efficient, but cannot compensate for the architectural advantage of the 870. Users heavily invested in mobile gaming will unequivocally benefit from the iQOO.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 67W wired charging is a significant advantage, promising a 0-100% charge in just 42 minutes. The iQOO Neo5 SE’s 55W charging is respectable, but slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the more efficient Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi could offset a potentially smaller battery, offering comparable or even better real-world battery life. The Redmi also supports PD3.0 and QC3, offering wider charger compatibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo5 SE if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, demanding applications, or future-proofing. Its Snapdragon 870 will handle anything you throw at it. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you prefer a more balanced experience with faster charging, potentially better battery optimization, and a focus on everyday usability rather than peak performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is not designed for high-end gaming. While it can run Genshin Impact, you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings significantly to achieve playable frame rates. The iQOO Neo5 SE with its Snapdragon 870 will provide a much smoother and more enjoyable gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the Snapdragon 870 compared to the Snapdragon 695 in real-world usage?
The Snapdragon 870 offers roughly 40-50% higher CPU and GPU performance than the Snapdragon 695. This translates to noticeably faster app launch times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface. For tasks like video editing or running demanding applications, the difference will be even more pronounced.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G support fast charging with standard USB-PD chargers?
Yes, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G supports USB Power Delivery (PD) 3.0, meaning you can utilize compatible USB-PD chargers for fast charging, offering greater flexibility and convenience.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between 55W and 67W really noticeable in everyday use?
While the difference of 12W might seem small, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G's 67W charging is significantly faster in practice, shaving off approximately 15-20 minutes from a full charge compared to the iQOO Neo5 SE's 55W charging.
