The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo iQOO Neo5 SE and Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO Neo5 SE takes the performance crown thanks to its Snapdragon 870 chipset. However, the Poco X5 Pro boasts faster charging, a brighter display, and potentially better camera versatility. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities: raw power or a more well-rounded experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 20 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 29 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, 650 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2 (Intl), 5.1 (India), A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band - India |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Aurora | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | V2157A | 22101320G, 22101320I |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 156.00 / $ 221.33 / ₹ 22,490 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 531398 (v9)
GeekBench: 2930 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo5 SE
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 870)
- Good Value for Money
- Decent Camera
- Slower Charging (55W)
- Less Bright Display
- Potentially Less Versatile Camera
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- Faster Charging (67W)
- Brighter Display
- Versatile Camera System
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Lower Performance (Snapdragon 778G)
- Infinite Contrast Ratio (Marketing Term)
- May lack raw power for demanding games
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 Pro shines with its measured 912 nits max brightness, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the iQOO Neo5 SE's display is good, it lacks the same level of brightness. The Poco X5 Pro's 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deep blacks and vibrant colors, though this is a marketing term. Both phones likely use AMOLED panels, providing rich colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective and depends on individual preferences. The Poco X5 Pro likely offers a more versatile camera system with potentially better image processing. While the iQOO Neo5 SE has a capable camera, it may not match the Poco X5 Pro's overall versatility. Both phones likely feature a main sensor, ultrawide, and macro lens.
Performance
Here, the iQOO Neo5 SE clearly wins. The Snapdragon 870 is a significantly more powerful chipset than the Snapdragon 778G found in the Poco X5 Pro. This translates to smoother gaming, faster app loading times, and better overall responsiveness. The Neo5 SE's CPU and GPU offer a noticeable performance advantage.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with the Poco X5 Pro boasting an endurance rating of 113h. The iQOO Neo5 SE's battery capacity is likely comparable, ensuring all-day usage. However, the Poco X5 Pro's 67W charging is significantly faster than the iQOO Neo5 SE's 55W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Neo5 SE is ideal for gamers and power users who prioritize performance above all else. The Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro is a great choice for those seeking a balanced device with a vibrant display, fast charging, and a versatile camera system, without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo iQOO Neo5 SE is the clear winner for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset.
❓ Does the Poco X5 Pro support reverse charging?
Yes, the Poco X5 Pro supports 5W reverse wired charging, allowing you to charge other devices using the phone's battery.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with the Poco X5 Pro having a slightly higher endurance rating, but real-world usage will likely be similar.
