The iQOO Neo5 SE and Xiaomi Poco F4 GT represent compelling options in the mid-to-high range, but cater to slightly different priorities. The Neo5 SE leverages the proven efficiency of the Snapdragon 870, while the F4 GT throws down the gauntlet with the flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 provides a significant performance uplift, and the blazing-fast 120W charging is a game-changer. While the iQOO Neo5 SE offers excellent value, the F4 GT’s raw power and charging speed justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 20 | 2022, April 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 29 | Available. Released 2022, April 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| | - | Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, 650 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Aurora | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow |
| Models | V2157A | 21121210G |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 81h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 952124 (v9)
GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) |
vivo iQOO Neo5 SE
- Excellent value for money
- Efficient Snapdragon 870 processor
- Competent all-around performance
- Slower charging speed (55W)
- Potentially less advanced camera system
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 performance
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Likely superior display and camera
- Higher price point
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both devices feature displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and panel type are missing. Given the Poco F4 GT’s positioning, it likely boasts a higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility. The iQOO Neo5 SE, being a more value-focused device, may prioritize cost savings in this area. Without specific refresh rate data, it's difficult to assess smoothness, but both are likely to offer at least 120Hz.
Camera Comparison
Context data only indicates 'Photo / Video' capabilities for both. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the Poco F4 GT’s flagship aspirations, it likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger sensor and optical image stabilization. The iQOO Neo5 SE will likely focus on providing a competent camera experience at a lower price point, potentially sacrificing some low-light performance and detail. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a primary camera-focused device.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F4 GT’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) represents a generational leap over the iQOO Neo5 SE’s Snapdragon 870 (7nm). The 8 Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 prime core, clocked at 3.00 GHz, offers a substantial single-core performance advantage. The F4 GT also benefits from newer Cortex-A710 performance cores. However, the 4nm process of the 8 Gen 1 is crucial; it aims to mitigate the increased power draw and potential thermal throttling associated with the higher performance. The Snapdragon 870 in the iQOO Neo5 SE remains a very capable chip, offering excellent performance for its price point, but will fall behind in sustained, demanding workloads. Both phones utilize octa-core CPUs, but the architectural differences are significant.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 81 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the iQOO Neo5 SE’s missing mAh specification. This similarity is likely due to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s higher power consumption being offset by optimizations and potentially a larger battery capacity in the F4 GT. The key differentiator is charging speed: the Poco F4 GT’s 120W charging, capable of a full charge in just 17 minutes, is dramatically faster than the iQOO Neo5 SE’s 55W charging. This makes the F4 GT significantly more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo5 SE if you prioritize sustained performance and value for money, and are comfortable with slightly slower charging. It’s ideal for everyday tasks, moderate gaming, and users who appreciate a balanced experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT if you demand the highest possible performance for demanding games and applications, and absolutely need the fastest charging available. This phone is geared towards power users and mobile gamers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the Poco F4 GT overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is known to generate more heat than previous generations. However, the Poco F4 GT likely incorporates advanced cooling solutions to mitigate this. While some throttling is possible during prolonged, demanding gaming, the 4nm process and potential cooling improvements should keep temperatures manageable for most users.
❓ Is the 55W charging on the iQOO Neo5 SE slow compared to the competition?
While 55W isn't the fastest charging available, it's still a respectable speed and will fully charge the device in a reasonable timeframe. It's a trade-off for the lower price point. The Poco F4 GT’s 120W charging is significantly faster, but 55W is still a substantial improvement over older charging standards.
❓ Does the Poco F4 GT support high frame rates in popular games like PUBG Mobile?
Given the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s processing power and the F4 GT’s gaming focus, it should be capable of running PUBG Mobile at high frame rates (60fps or higher), potentially even at extreme settings. However, achieving consistent high frame rates will depend on the game’s optimization and the device’s thermal management.
