vivo iQOO Neo5 SE vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO Neo5 SE takes the crown for raw performance thanks to its Snapdragon 870 chipset. However, the Mi 11 Lite 5G shines with its vibrant display, sleek design, and longer-lasting battery. It depends on whether you prioritize speed or overall experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo5 SE | Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 20 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 29 | Available. Released 2021, April 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 160.5 x 75.7 x 6.8 mm (6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 159 g (5.61 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, 650 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 3x2.2 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.90 GHz Kryo 670) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7350-AB Snapdragon 780G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 642 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4250 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Aurora | Truffle Black, Mint Green, Citrus Yellow |
| Models | V2157A | M2101K9G, M2101K9C, M2101K9R |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 106h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 465534 (v8) | 522490 (v9) GeekBench: 2909 (v5.1) GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo5 SE
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 870)
- Faster Charging (55W)
- Likely better value for performance
- Potentially less impressive display
- Battery life may be shorter
- Design might be less premium
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- Longer battery life
- Sleek and stylish design
- Less powerful chipset (Snapdragon 780G)
- Slower charging (33W)
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G boasts a significantly brighter display (846 nits vs. likely around 500 nits for the iQOO Neo5 SE) and an impressive contrast ratio, offering a more visually appealing experience. While the iQOO Neo5 SE's display is perfectly adequate, the Mi 11 Lite 5G's is noticeably superior.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Mi 11 Lite 5G likely has a slight edge in image processing and overall photo quality, especially in well-lit conditions. The iQOO Neo5 SE's camera is still very good, but may not offer the same level of refinement. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would be needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
Here's where the iQOO Neo5 SE truly excels. The Snapdragon 870 is a considerably more powerful chipset than the Snapdragon 780G found in the Mi 11 Lite 5G. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and significantly better gaming performance on the iQOO Neo5 SE.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G's endurance rating of 106 hours suggests significantly better battery life than the iQOO Neo5 SE, despite the latter's 55W fast charging. While the iQOO Neo5 SE charges faster, the Mi 11 Lite 5G will likely last longer between charges.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Neo5 SE is ideal for gamers and power users who demand smooth performance and fast charging. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G is a great choice for those who value a stylish design, excellent display quality, and extended battery life.