The vivo iQOO Neo series consistently delivers impressive performance at competitive prices. Both the iQOO Neo5 SE and Neo 6 feature the powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset, but they differ in key areas like charging speed, display quality, and overall features. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO Neo 6 edges out the Neo5 SE thanks to its significantly faster 80W charging, brighter display, and potentially improved camera capabilities. However, the Neo5 SE remains a strong contender, especially for budget-conscious buyers seeking excellent performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 20 | 2022, May 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 29 | Available. Released 2022, May 31 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 163 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, 650 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 80W wired, 50% in 12 min, 100% in 32 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Aurora | Dark Nova, Cyber Rage |
| Models | V2157A | I2126 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 97h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.0 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 627246 (v8), 730223 (v9)
GeekBench: 3076 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo5 SE
- Excellent performance for the price
- Snapdragon 870 chipset
- 55W fast charging
- Good value
- Less bright display
- Potentially less advanced camera
- Slower charging compared to Neo 6
- Likely IPS LCD panel
vivo iQOO Neo 6
- Faster 80W charging
- Brighter and potentially better display (AMOLED)
- Likely improved camera system
- Premium feel
- Higher price
- Similar performance to Neo5 SE (chipset)
- Endurance rating is a claim and may vary
Display Comparison
The iQOO Neo 6 boasts a noticeable advantage in display quality. Its measured 772 nits max brightness is considerably higher than the Neo5 SE, offering better visibility in sunlight. The Neo 6's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. While the Neo5 SE's display is perfectly adequate, the Neo 6 provides a more premium viewing experience. Panel type is likely AMOLED on the Neo 6 and IPS LCD on the Neo5 SE.
Camera Comparison
While both are listed as 'Photo / Video', the iQOO Neo 6 likely has a more advanced camera system. The Neo 6 likely features a higher resolution primary sensor and potentially improved image processing algorithms. The Neo5 SE's camera is competent, but the Neo 6 is expected to deliver better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. Specific sensor details are missing for both, making a definitive comparison difficult.
Performance
Both phones share the same Snapdragon 870 chipset and CPU configuration, meaning performance in most tasks will be very similar. Expect smooth multitasking, responsive gaming, and efficient app handling on both devices. Minor differences in thermal management might arise under sustained heavy load, but overall, performance is a draw.
Battery Life
The iQOO Neo 6's 80W charging is a game-changer. It can charge 50% in just 12 minutes and 100% in 32 minutes, significantly faster than the Neo5 SE's 55W charging. Both phones claim an endurance rating of 97 hours, suggesting comparable battery capacity and efficiency in typical usage scenarios.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Neo5 SE is ideal for users prioritizing raw performance and a more affordable price point. It's a great choice for mobile gaming and everyday tasks. The iQOO Neo 6 is better suited for those who value faster charging, a superior display experience, and potentially a more refined camera system, even if it comes at a slightly higher cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 870 chipset still good in 2024?
Yes, the Snapdragon 870 remains a very capable chipset, offering excellent performance for everyday tasks and gaming. It's a flagship-level processor from a previous generation, making it a great value in mid-range devices.
❓ What is the difference between AMOLED and IPS LCD displays?
AMOLED displays offer better contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors compared to IPS LCD displays. They also tend to be more power-efficient. IPS LCDs are generally more affordable and offer accurate color reproduction.
