The iQOO Neo5 SE and Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Neo5 SE, leveraging the Snapdragon 870, aims for raw performance, while the Reno7 Pro 5G, powered by the Dimensity 1200 Max, focuses on a balanced experience with faster charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and value, the iQOO Neo5 SE emerges as the winner. While the Reno7 Pro 5G boasts faster 65W charging, the Snapdragon 870’s efficiency and proven track record provide a smoother, more consistent experience, especially during demanding tasks like gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 41, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 20 | 2021, November 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 29 | Available. Released 2021, December 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Panda Glass) |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 158.2 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| | - | RGB notification lights around the camera island |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, 650 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 920 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core 3.0 GHz |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | ARM G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Aurora | Starlight Black, Startrails Blue, Gold, League of Legends |
| Models | V2157A | PFDM00, CPH2293 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 400 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo5 SE
- Proven Snapdragon 870 performance
- Excellent thermal management
- Strong value for money
- Slower charging speed compared to Reno7 Pro
- Potentially less refined camera system
Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G
- Ultra-fast 65W charging with 31-minute full charge
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Likely superior camera system
- Dimensity 1200 Max may throttle under sustained load
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
Context data lacks display specifics. However, given the Reno7 Pro’s positioning, it likely features a higher-quality AMOLED panel with potentially higher peak brightness and color accuracy compared to the iQOO Neo5 SE. Oppo historically prioritizes display quality, and the Reno series is known for vibrant visuals. The iQOO Neo series typically focuses on value, so a slightly less refined display is expected. Both are likely to feature 120Hz refresh rates, but the Reno7 Pro may benefit from LTPO technology for variable refresh rate and improved efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Oppo generally invests heavily in camera technology, and the Reno7 Pro 5G likely features a more sophisticated camera system with potentially larger sensors and improved image processing algorithms. The Reno series often includes features like dedicated NPU for AI-powered scene recognition and image enhancement. The iQOO Neo5 SE will likely offer a capable camera, but it will likely prioritize value over cutting-edge features. Expect the Reno7 Pro to excel in low-light photography and video recording.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Neo5 SE’s Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a well-established performer, known for its balance of power and efficiency. Its octa-core configuration (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585, 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585, 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) provides ample processing power. The Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 1200 Max, with its 3.0 GHz octa-core CPU, offers a theoretical clock speed advantage. However, the Snapdragon 870’s architecture and Qualcomm’s optimizations often translate to better sustained performance and thermal management. The Dimensity 1200 Max, while powerful, can be prone to throttling under prolonged heavy load. The iQOO Neo5 SE’s likely use of LPDDR5 RAM further enhances its performance edge.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G’s 65W wired charging, capable of a full charge in 31 minutes, is a significant advantage. This drastically reduces downtime compared to the iQOO Neo5 SE’s 55W charging. While the iQOO Neo5 SE’s battery capacity is unknown, the Reno7 Pro’s faster charging effectively mitigates any potential capacity difference. The Reno7 Pro also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the iQOO Neo5 SE, allowing it to top up other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo5 SE if you need a phone that consistently delivers strong performance for gaming and multitasking, and you value a proven chipset with good thermal management. Buy the Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G if you prioritize incredibly fast charging speeds and appreciate a more polished software experience, even if it means potentially sacrificing some sustained peak performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Dimensity 1200 Max in the Reno7 Pro 5G prone to overheating during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 1200 Max is a powerful chipset, it's known to generate more heat than the Snapdragon 870. This can lead to thermal throttling during prolonged gaming, potentially reducing frame rates and impacting performance. The iQOO Neo5 SE’s Snapdragon 870 is generally more efficient and maintains higher sustained performance.
❓ How much faster is the 65W charging on the Oppo Reno7 Pro 5G compared to the 55W charging on the iQOO Neo5 SE in real-world use?
The Reno7 Pro 5G’s 65W charging can fully charge the device in approximately 31 minutes. The iQOO Neo5 SE’s 55W charging will take noticeably longer, likely around 45-60 minutes depending on battery capacity. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to quickly top up their phone.
❓ Does the iQOO Neo5 SE support high frame rate gaming, like 90fps or 120fps in popular titles like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 870 is capable of supporting high frame rates in many games, including PUBG Mobile. However, achieving 90fps or 120fps will depend on the game’s settings and optimization. The iQOO Neo5 SE’s efficient thermal management will help maintain these frame rates for longer periods compared to the Reno7 Pro 5G.
