iQOO Neo5 SE vs OnePlus Nord 2 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the iQOO Neo5 SE with its Snapdragon 870 is the clear winner. However, the OnePlus Nord 2 5G offers a well-rounded experience with comparable battery endurance and a potentially more refined software experience, making it a strong contender for those valuing overall balance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo5 SE | OnePlus Nord 2 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 20 | 2021, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 29 | Available. Released 2021, July 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.7 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 159.1 x 73.3 x 8.3 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, 650 nits (typ) | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Auto HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, SBAS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 30 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Aurora | Gray Sierra, Blue Haze, Green Wood, Pac-Man Edition |
| Models | V2157A | DN2101, DN2103 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 189.00 / $ 219.99 / £ 148.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 102h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 512164 (v8) | 598022 (v9) GeekBench: 2792 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo5 SE
- Superior CPU performance with Snapdragon 870
- Potentially better sustained gaming performance
- Fast 55W charging
- Battery life may be slightly less than Nord 2 5G
- Camera details are unknown, potentially less refined
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
- Excellent battery life (102h Endurance rating)
- Faster 65W charging with PD support
- Potentially smoother software experience
- Dimensity 1200 offers slightly less raw CPU power
- May exhibit more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 633 nits, a respectable figure for outdoor visibility. While the iQOO Neo5 SE’s display specifications aren’t provided, iQOO typically prioritizes high refresh rates in this series. The Nord 2 5G’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a typical AMOLED panel, offering deep blacks. Without specific details on the iQOO Neo5 SE’s panel technology, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Nord 2 5G’s brightness is a known quantity.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given OnePlus’s history, the Nord 2 5G likely emphasizes image processing for natural-looking photos, while iQOO often leans towards more vibrant, saturated colors. The absence of details suggests neither phone is targeting the high-end camera market, focusing instead on providing adequate performance for social media and casual photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the iQOO Neo5 SE utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm), while the OnePlus Nord 2 5G features the MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (6nm). The Dimensity 1200’s 6nm process *should* offer slightly better power efficiency, but the Snapdragon 870 is known for its sustained performance and excellent thermal management. The Snapdragon 870’s Kryo 585 cores, with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, provide a slight clock speed advantage over the Dimensity 1200’s Cortex-A78 (3.0 GHz). This translates to a noticeable edge in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The iQOO Neo5 SE is likely to maintain higher frame rates for longer periods due to Qualcomm’s optimization.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an impressive Endurance rating of 102 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities (not specified). However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The iQOO Neo5 SE offers 55W wired charging, while the OnePlus Nord 2 5G boasts 65W wired charging with PD support and a claimed 100% charge in 30 minutes. This faster charging speed gives the Nord 2 5G a clear advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo5 SE if you need uncompromising performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value the fastest possible charging speeds. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2 5G if you prefer a more balanced experience with excellent battery life, a potentially smoother software experience, and a focus on consistent, all-day usability. The Nord 2 5G is ideal for users who don't push their phones to the absolute limit.