iQOO Neo5 S vs OnePlus 9RT 5G: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and potentially a more streamlined software experience, the iQOO Neo5 S emerges as the winner. Its 66W charging achieves 70% capacity in just 18 minutes, a significant advantage over the OnePlus 9RT's 29-minute full charge, despite both utilizing the Snapdragon 888.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo5 S | OnePlus 9RT 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 20 | 2021, October 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 25 | Available. Released 2021, October 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 76.4 x 8.4 mm (6.43 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) | 162.2 x 74.6 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 106.3 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS Ocean | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56”, 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 70% in 18 min | 65W wired, 100% in 29 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Orange, Blue, Black | Hacker Black, Nano Silver, Blue |
| Models | - | MT2110, MT2111 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 590 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo5 S
- Faster 66W charging (70% in 18 mins)
- Potentially more aggressive thermal management for sustained performance
- Competitive price point for Snapdragon 888 performance
- Funtouch OS may not appeal to all users
- Limited information on camera capabilities
OnePlus 9RT 5G
- OxygenOS offers a cleaner software experience
- Potentially wider software update support
- Established brand reputation within the Android community
- Slower 65W charging (100% in 29 mins)
- May be priced slightly higher than the iQOO Neo5 S
- Thermal throttling potential with Snapdragon 888
Display Comparison
While specific display details (resolution, refresh rate, panel type) are absent from the provided data, both phones likely feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED panels, common for devices in this segment. The focus here shifts to charging, as display quality is often comparable. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests a standard refresh rate implementation, potentially impacting battery life during sustained high-refresh-rate usage.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. The image processing algorithms will be a key differentiator. OnePlus typically aims for a more natural look, while vivo often enhances colors and contrast. The absence of sensor size data makes it difficult to assess low-light performance, but larger sensors generally capture more light and produce better images in challenging conditions.
Performance
Both the iQOO Neo5 S and OnePlus 9RT 5G are powered by the Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means raw processing power will be virtually identical. Performance differences will likely stem from thermal management and RAM optimization. The 5nm process node is efficient, but the Snapdragon 888 is known to generate heat under sustained load; how each manufacturer handles this will be crucial for maintaining peak performance during gaming or demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The battery capacity isn't specified, but the charging speeds are a clear point of divergence. The iQOO Neo5 S boasts 66W wired charging, achieving 70% charge in just 18 minutes. The OnePlus 9RT 5G offers 65W wired charging, taking 29 minutes to reach 100%. This 11-minute difference is significant for users who prioritize quick top-ups. While a larger battery capacity on the OnePlus 9RT could offset this, the faster charging of the iQOO Neo5 S provides a more immediate benefit for those constantly on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo5 S if you prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and are comfortable with vivo’s Funtouch OS. This phone is ideal for users who frequently top up their battery throughout the day and demand minimal downtime. Buy the OnePlus 9RT 5G if you prefer OxygenOS’s cleaner interface and a potentially wider availability of software updates, even if it means sacrificing some charging speed. It’s a solid choice for users invested in the OnePlus ecosystem.