The iQOO Neo5 Lite and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a 5G experience, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in the chipset and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value for specific user needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and responsiveness, the iQOO Neo5 Lite is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 870 5G. While the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G boasts faster 67W charging, the iQOO’s superior processing power makes it the better choice for gamers and power users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 24 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 24 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.3 g (6.98 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.0 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 33 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | V2118A | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 250 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo5 Lite
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 870)
- Superior gaming performance
- More responsive user experience
- Slower charging speed (44W)
- Potentially less advanced camera system
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Extremely fast 67W charging
- Potentially better camera hardware
- More efficient chipset (Snapdragon 695)
- Noticeably slower processor (Snapdragon 695)
- Less capable for demanding games
- May exhibit more throttling under load
Display Comparison
Context data lacks display specifics. However, given the price points, both likely feature AMOLED panels. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G, being newer, *may* offer a slightly higher peak brightness. The iQOO Neo5 Lite's display quality will be adequate, but the Redmi's newer panel tech could provide a more vibrant viewing experience. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is marketed with a focus on its camera, potentially featuring a larger sensor. The iQOO Neo5 Lite likely prioritizes overall performance over camera capabilities. Image processing styles will also differ; Xiaomi typically leans towards more saturated colors, while vivo often aims for a more natural look. The presence of OIS on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for low-light photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Neo5 Lite’s Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a significant step up from the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The 870 features a Kryo 585 core clocked at 3.2 GHz, compared to the 695’s 2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores. This translates to substantially faster CPU and GPU performance, benefiting gamers and users running demanding apps. The 6nm process of the 695 offers some efficiency gains, but the 870’s architectural advantages outweigh this. The iQOO will exhibit less throttling under sustained load. RAM type is not specified, but LPDDR5 is likely on both, with the iQOO potentially benefitting more from the faster processor.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 67W charging is a clear advantage, achieving 50% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes. The iQOO Neo5 Lite’s 44W charging, while respectable, takes longer to reach full capacity (70% in 33 minutes). Battery capacity is not specified, but the faster charging of the Redmi mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The Snapdragon 870’s efficiency, however, could offset some of the Redmi’s charging advantage in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo5 Lite if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games and applications with ease, and if you value a smoother overall user experience. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you prioritize extremely fast charging and are a more casual user who doesn't heavily rely on mobile gaming or intensive multitasking.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is not ideally suited for demanding games like Genshin Impact. While playable at lower settings, you'll likely experience frame drops and stuttering. The iQOO Neo5 Lite’s Snapdragon 870 will provide a much smoother and more consistent gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G compared to the iQOO Neo5 Lite in a typical use case?
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G can gain approximately 50% charge in just 15 minutes, while the iQOO Neo5 Lite takes around 20-25 minutes to reach the same level. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the Snapdragon 870 and 695 noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
While both phones will handle everyday tasks smoothly, the Snapdragon 870 in the iQOO Neo5 Lite will feel noticeably snappier and more responsive, especially when switching between apps or multitasking. The 870’s extra processing power provides a more fluid user experience.
