The iQOO Neo5 Lite and Xiaomi Poco F3 GT represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both devices target performance-conscious users, but they achieve this through different chipsets and design philosophies. The iQOO leverages Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 870, known for its efficiency, while the Poco F3 GT opts for MediaTek’s Dimensity 1200, prioritizing raw power. This comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and efficient charging, the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT emerges as the winner. Its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Dimensity 1200, despite being on a 6nm process, delivers a noticeable performance edge in demanding tasks, making it ideal for gamers and power users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 24 | 2021, July 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 24 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.3 g (6.98 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.0 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 33 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver |
| Models | V2118A | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) |
vivo iQOO Neo5 Lite
- Efficient Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Reliable and consistent performance
- Potentially better thermal management
- Slower 44W charging
- May lag behind in peak performance
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3
- More powerful Dimensity 1200 chipset
- Potentially better graphics performance
- Dimensity 1200 may run hotter under sustained load
- 6nm process may not be as efficient as 7nm
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature high refresh rate displays (data not provided, assumed based on market segment), the core difference lies in the underlying processors impacting display responsiveness. The Snapdragon 870’s Adreno 660 GPU will handle graphics rendering efficiently, but the Dimensity 1200’s Mali-G78 MP16 GPU offers a theoretical advantage in raw graphical horsepower. Without specific display specs like peak brightness or panel type, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Dimensity 1200’s GPU suggests a potential edge in graphically intensive applications.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, both brands typically focus on delivering competitive camera performance in this price segment. The image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 1200 is capable of handling high-resolution sensors and advanced image processing techniques. The Snapdragon 870’s ISP is also capable, but the Dimensity 1200’s newer architecture may offer slight advantages in image quality and processing speed. The absence of information regarding sensor size and optical image stabilization (OIS) makes it impossible to determine a clear winner.
Performance
The heart of the comparison is the chipset battle: Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) versus MediaTek’s Dimensity 1200 (6nm). The Dimensity 1200, built on a smaller 6nm node, generally offers higher peak performance due to its Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 3.0 GHz, compared to the Snapdragon 870’s 3.2 GHz Kryo 585. However, the Snapdragon 870’s architecture is known for its excellent sustained performance and thermal efficiency. The Dimensity 1200’s higher clock speeds and more powerful GPU will benefit gamers and users running demanding applications, while the Snapdragon 870 provides a more balanced experience. The Snapdragon 870’s CPU configuration (1x3.2 GHz, 3x2.42 GHz, 4x1.80 GHz) is designed for efficient task allocation, while the Dimensity 1200 (1x3.0 GHz, 3x2.6 GHz, 4x2.0 GHz) prioritizes peak performance.
Battery Life
The Poco F3 GT’s 67W wired charging is a significant advantage, promising a full charge in just 42 minutes with PD3.0 and QC3 support. The iQOO Neo5 Lite’s 44W charging, while respectable, takes longer at 70% in 33 minutes, implying a full charge will exceed 60 minutes. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the Poco F3 GT mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The 6nm process of the Dimensity 1200 may also contribute to slightly better power efficiency, further offsetting any capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo5 Lite if you need a balanced device with reliable performance for everyday tasks and appreciate a slightly more efficient chipset. It’s a solid choice for users who value longevity and don’t necessarily need the absolute fastest processing speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT if you prioritize gaming, fast charging, and raw processing power. Its Dimensity 1200 and 67W charging make it a compelling option for those who demand the best possible performance in a mid-range package.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 1200 in the Poco F3 GT overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 1200 is a powerful chip, it can generate more heat than the Snapdragon 870 under sustained load. However, Xiaomi typically implements effective thermal management solutions in their gaming-focused devices like the Poco F3 GT. Expect some throttling during extremely long gaming sessions, but it shouldn't significantly impact the overall experience.
❓ Is the 44W charging on the iQOO Neo5 Lite slow compared to the competition?
44W charging is still relatively fast, but the Poco F3 GT’s 67W charging is considerably quicker. The iQOO Neo5 Lite will take longer to fully charge, which may be a drawback for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. However, the difference in charging speed may not be noticeable for casual users.
❓ Which phone is better for playing PUBG Mobile at high frame rates?
The Poco F3 GT, with its Dimensity 1200 and Mali-G78 MP16 GPU, is likely to deliver a smoother experience at higher frame rates in PUBG Mobile. The more powerful GPU can handle the demanding graphics and maintain a stable frame rate, even during intense firefights. The Snapdragon 870 in the iQOO Neo5 Lite is capable, but the Dimensity 1200 has a theoretical advantage.
