iQOO Neo5 Lite vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding tasks, the iQOO Neo5 Lite is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 870. However, the Mi 11 Lite 5G offers a more refined experience with its brighter display and potentially longer battery life, making it ideal for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo5 Lite | Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 24 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 24 | Available. Released 2021, April 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 160.5 x 75.7 x 6.8 mm (6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.3 g (6.98 oz) | 159 g (5.61 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.0 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 3x2.2 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.90 GHz Kryo 670) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7350-AB Snapdragon 780G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 642 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 33 min | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4250 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Truffle Black, Mint Green, Citrus Yellow |
| Models | V2118A | M2101K9G, M2101K9C, M2101K9R |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 106h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 465534 (v8) | 522490 (v9) GeekBench: 2909 (v5.1) GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo5 Lite
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 870)
- Faster charging speed (44W)
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Less information available on display quality
- Potentially lower battery endurance
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
- Brighter display (846 nits)
- Excellent battery life (106h endurance)
- Sleek and lightweight design
- Less powerful processor (Snapdragon 780G)
- Slower charging speed (33W)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured 846 nits. This is a significant advantage for outdoor visibility compared to the iQOO Neo5 Lite, for which peak brightness data is unavailable. While both offer an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the higher peak brightness of the Mi 11 Lite 5G translates to a more vivid and punchy image. The iQOO Neo5 Lite’s display specs are less detailed, suggesting a focus on cost optimization rather than display excellence.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Mi 11 Lite 5G likely prioritizes image processing and software enhancements for a more polished, consumer-friendly experience. The iQOO Neo5 Lite, geared towards performance, may offer less refined image processing. The absence of details regarding OIS on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The iQOO Neo5 Lite’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) chipset is the star, featuring a Kryo 585 core clocked at 3.2 GHz. This is a substantial step up from the Mi 11 Lite 5G’s Snapdragon 780G (5nm), which tops out at 2.4 GHz. The 7nm process node of the 870 is less efficient than the 5nm node of the 780G, but the higher clock speeds and core configuration provide a significant performance boost, particularly in CPU-intensive tasks. The iQOO Neo5 Lite will demonstrably outperform the Mi 11 Lite 5G in benchmarks and real-world gaming scenarios. The Mi 11 Lite 5G’s 5nm process, however, contributes to better thermal management and potentially longer sustained performance under load.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G has an endurance rating of 106 hours, indicating strong battery life. While the iQOO Neo5 Lite’s battery capacity is unknown, its 44W wired charging (70% in 33 minutes) is faster than the Mi 11 Lite 5G’s 33W charging (PD3.0, QC4). This faster charging mitigates any potential battery capacity disadvantage the iQOO Neo5 Lite might have. The Mi 11 Lite 5G’s efficiency from the 5nm Snapdragon 780G likely contributes to its longer endurance rating.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo5 Lite if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, video editing, or multitasking. Its Snapdragon 870 delivers a significant performance advantage. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G if you prefer a lighter, more stylish phone with a vibrant display and excellent battery endurance for typical daily use. It’s the better choice for media consumption and general productivity.