Choosing a new smartphone can be overwhelming, especially with so many options from vivo. The iQOO Neo5 Lite and V23 Pro are both compelling choices, but cater to different priorities. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO Neo5 Lite takes the performance crown with its Snapdragon 870 chipset, offering significantly faster speeds for gaming and demanding tasks. The V23 Pro shines with its brighter display and potentially better camera capabilities, alongside exceptional battery life. It depends on your priorities: power vs. display and camera.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 24 | 2022, January 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 24 | Available. Released 2022, January 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Schott Xensation α), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 159.5 x 73.3 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.89 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.3 g (6.98 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Schott Xensation α glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.0 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | Color changing back panel when exposed to sunlight |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 33 min | 44W wired, 63% in 30 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 4300 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Sunshine Gold, Stardust Black |
| Models | V2118A | V2132 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 460 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.22 W/kg (head) 0.63 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 110h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 635060 (v8), 716766 (v9)
GeekBench: 12377 (v4.4), 3021 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo5 Lite
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 870)
- Fast Charging (44W)
- Smooth Gaming Experience
- Competitive Price
- Potentially Less Advanced Camera
- Lower Display Brightness Compared to V23 Pro
- Design may be less premium
vivo V23 Pro
- Brighter Display (798 nits)
- Exceptional Battery Life (110h Endurance)
- Potentially Better Camera System
- Premium Design
- Lower Performance Compared to iQOO Neo5 Lite
- Dimensity 1200 Chipset Less Powerful
- Potentially Higher Price
Display Comparison
The vivo V23 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 798 nits, significantly brighter than the iQOO Neo5 Lite. While the iQOO Neo5 Lite's display is perfectly adequate, the V23 Pro's higher brightness makes it more visible in direct sunlight. The V23 Pro's 'infinite' contrast ratio suggests excellent image depth, though this is a nominal value. Both likely feature AMOLED panels with vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the V23 Pro is generally expected to have a more advanced camera system. The V23 Pro likely features a higher resolution main sensor and potentially better image processing algorithms. The iQOO Neo5 Lite's camera is competent, but not a standout feature. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture, features) would be needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
Here, the iQOO Neo5 Lite clearly wins. The Snapdragon 870 is a flagship-level chipset, offering substantially more processing power than the Dimensity 1200 in the V23 Pro. Expect smoother gaming, faster app loading times, and better overall responsiveness on the iQOO Neo5 Lite. The Neo5 Lite's 7nm process also contributes to better power efficiency under load.
Battery Life
The vivo V23 Pro claims an impressive endurance rating of 110 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. The iQOO Neo5 Lite's 44W charging is fast, reaching 70% in 33 minutes, but the V23 Pro's battery capacity is likely larger, contributing to its longer endurance. While both offer 44W charging, the V23 Pro's battery likely lasts longer between charges.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Neo5 Lite is ideal for gamers and users who prioritize raw performance and smooth multitasking. The vivo V23 Pro is a better choice for photography enthusiasts, those who value a vibrant display, and users seeking long-lasting battery life.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The iQOO Neo5 Lite is significantly better for gaming due to its Snapdragon 870 chipset, which offers superior performance and smoother frame rates.
❓ Does the V23 Pro have a better camera?
The V23 Pro is likely to have a better camera system overall, but a detailed comparison requires specific camera specifications for both devices.
