iQOO Neo5 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding tasks, the iQOO Neo5 Lite is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 870. However, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G offers a more polished all-around experience with its brighter display and comparable battery life, making it ideal for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo5 Lite | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 24 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 24 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.3 g (6.98 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.0 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 33 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | V2118A | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 290 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo5 Lite
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 870
- Faster 44W charging
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Display brightness likely lower than A52s 5G
- Camera performance details unknown
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Brighter 800 nit display
- Balanced performance with Snapdragon 778G
- Samsung’s refined software experience
- Slower 25W charging
- Less powerful CPU for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured 800 nits, which translates to superior visibility outdoors. While the iQOO Neo5 Lite’s display specifications aren’t provided, it’s likely lower in peak brightness. The A52s 5G’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a strong AMOLED panel, offering deep blacks and vibrant colors. The A52s 5G’s display is likely to be more enjoyable for media consumption in bright environments.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. The A52s 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s image processing expertise, potentially delivering more consistent and visually appealing results in various lighting conditions. Without specific sensor size or aperture data for the iQOO Neo5 Lite, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the A52s 5G, if present, would provide a significant advantage in video recording and low-light photography.
Performance
The iQOO Neo5 Lite’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) chipset is a significant step up from the Galaxy A52s 5G’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The 870 features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 3.2 GHz Kryo 585 prime core versus the A52s’ 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78. This translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. The 6nm process of the 778G offers better power efficiency, but the 870’s raw horsepower will be more noticeable in demanding applications. The iQOO Neo5 Lite will likely exhibit less throttling during sustained gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating comparable battery life despite the iQOO Neo5 Lite’s focus on performance. However, the iQOO Neo5 Lite’s 44W wired charging is significantly faster than the A52s 5G’s 25W charging, reaching 70% charge in just 33 minutes. This faster charging speed is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo5 Lite if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, video editing, or multitasking. Its Snapdragon 870 provides a significant edge in CPU and GPU intensive workloads. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you prefer a balanced smartphone experience with a vibrant display, reliable battery life, and Samsung’s well-established software ecosystem. It’s the better choice for everyday use and casual gaming.