iQOO Neo5 Lite vs Motorola Edge 20 Fusion: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the iQOO Neo5 Lite emerges as the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset provides a significant performance uplift over the Dimensity 800U, making it ideal for demanding tasks and gaming. While the Edge 20 Fusion offers a respectable experience, it can't match the iQOO's processing power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo5 Lite | Motorola Edge 20 Fusion |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 66 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 24 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 24 | Available. Released 2021, August 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 166 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.54 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.3 g (6.98 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.0 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 33 min | 30W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Electric Graphite, Cyber Teal |
| Models | V2118A | - |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 250 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo5 Lite
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 870
- Faster 44W charging for quick top-ups
- Likely better gaming performance due to thermal efficiency
- Software experience may be less refined than Motorola
- Potential for more aggressive power consumption
Motorola Edge 20 Fusion
- Cleaner, near-stock Android experience
- Potentially better color accuracy in display
- Generally good software update support from Motorola
- Dimensity 800U offers significantly less processing power
- Slower 30W charging
- May struggle with demanding games and multitasking
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the price bracket, both likely feature 120Hz AMOLED panels. However, the iQOO Neo5 Lite, historically, leans towards higher brightness panels to enhance gaming visibility. The Motorola Edge 20 Fusion, typical of Motorola, likely prioritizes color accuracy. The absence of LTPO technology on either suggests standard refresh rate scaling, impacting battery life during dynamic content viewing.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the iQOO Neo5 Lite, given vivo’s camera-centric reputation, likely prioritizes image processing algorithms for vibrant, social media-ready photos. The Motorola Edge 20 Fusion, while capable, typically focuses on a more natural color profile. The absence of information regarding sensor size and OIS makes it difficult to assess low-light performance, but a larger sensor on the iQOO Neo5 Lite would be expected given the brand's focus.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Neo5 Lite’s Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – an octa-core setup with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz – compared to the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s Dimensity 800U (7nm) with its 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. This translates to a noticeable advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and sustained performance. The Snapdragon 870’s Kryo 585 cores are architecturally superior to the Cortex-A76, offering better IPC (Instructions Per Clock). While both use 7nm fabrication, Qualcomm’s process optimization generally yields better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The iQOO Neo5 Lite will demonstrably outperform the Edge 20 Fusion in benchmarks and real-world gaming.
Battery Life
The iQOO Neo5 Lite’s 44W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s 30W charging. The iQOO claims 70% charge in 33 minutes, while the Edge 20 Fusion will take considerably longer to reach full capacity. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the iQOO Neo5 Lite mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery, allowing for quicker top-ups and reduced downtime. This is crucial for users who frequently engage in power-intensive activities.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo5 Lite if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games, multitasking, and benefit from significantly faster 44W charging. This is the choice for power users and mobile gamers. Buy the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion if you prioritize a cleaner software experience and a more balanced feature set, and are willing to trade some processing power for potentially better software support and a slightly more refined aesthetic.