The vivo iQOO Neo3 5G and the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 represent compelling options in the mid-range 5G smartphone space, both powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G chipset. However, they diverge significantly in their approach to features like charging, software, and overall user experience, making a direct comparison crucial for informed buyers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw charging speed and a streamlined gaming experience, the vivo iQOO Neo3 5G is the clear winner. Its 44W charging significantly outperforms the S20 FE's 25W, and its focus on performance is evident. However, the S20 FE 2022 offers the benefits of wireless charging and Samsung's established software ecosystem.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 25, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (3.3 Gbps DL) | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat19 1800/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 23. Released 2020, April 29 | 2022, April 01 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, April 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.6 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 159.8 x 74.5 x 8.4 mm (6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.1 g (6.98 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| | - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.0 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, iQOO UI 1.0 | Android 12, One UI 4.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 12 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.76", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.4, 76mm (telephoto), 1/4.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/384kHz audio
Tuned by AKG |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing
Bixby natural language commands and dictation
Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 20 min, 100% in 58 min | 25W wired, PD3.0
15W wireless (Qi)
4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black/Dark Blue | Cloud White, Cloud Lavender, Cloud Navy |
| Models | V1981A | SM-G781NK, SM-G781NK22 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 520 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G
- Significantly faster 44W wired charging
- Likely optimized thermal management for gaming
- Potentially more aggressive pricing
- Lacks wireless charging
- Software experience may be less refined than Samsung's One UI
- Camera system likely less advanced
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022
- Wireless charging (15W) and reverse wireless charging
- Samsung's One UI offers a polished software experience
- Potentially superior camera system with advanced image processing
- Slower 25W wired charging
- May be more expensive than the iQOO Neo3 5G
- Thermal throttling could be more pronounced under sustained load
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature AMOLED panels (based on brand tendencies), the context data doesn't specify display characteristics. The S20 FE 2022, being a flagship-adjacent device, likely boasts a higher peak brightness and potentially a higher resolution display. However, without specific nit ratings or resolution details, it's difficult to definitively state a display advantage. The S20 FE's inclusion of a 120Hz refresh rate (a common feature for the model) would provide a smoother visual experience than a standard 60Hz panel, if the iQOO Neo3 doesn't offer a similar feature.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks camera specifications. However, the S20 FE 2022, originating from Samsung, is expected to have a more sophisticated camera system with advanced image processing algorithms. Samsung's history suggests a focus on vibrant, saturated colors, while iQOO typically aims for a more natural look. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the S20 FE is highly probable, offering superior image stabilization compared to the iQOO Neo3, assuming it lacks OIS. Sensor size and lens apertures, crucial for low-light performance, remain unknown.
Performance
Both the iQOO Neo3 5G and the S20 FE 2022 utilize the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) chipset, featuring the same octa-core CPU configuration: 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55. This means raw CPU performance will be nearly identical. The key differentiator will be thermal management. The iQOO Neo3, often marketed towards gamers, likely employs a more aggressive cooling solution to sustain peak performance for longer durations. RAM configurations, not specified, could also play a role, with LPDDR5 being the expected standard for both.
Battery Life
The iQOO Neo3 5G’s 44W wired charging is a significant advantage over the S20 FE 2022’s 25W wired charging. The iQOO Neo3 can reach 50% charge in just 20 minutes and 100% in 58 minutes, while the S20 FE will take considerably longer. The S20 FE compensates with 15W wireless charging (Qi standard) and 4.5W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the iQOO Neo3. Battery capacity, not specified, will influence overall endurance, but the faster charging of the iQOO Neo3 mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo3 5G if you need blazing-fast charging, a dedicated gaming focus, and don't mind a less polished software experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 if you prefer wireless charging, a more refined software experience with Samsung's One UI, and value brand recognition and ecosystem integration.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 865 in the iQOO Neo3 5G throttle under heavy gaming loads?
While both phones share the Snapdragon 865, the iQOO Neo3 5G is marketed towards gamers and likely incorporates a more robust cooling system. This suggests it will sustain peak performance for longer periods before throttling occurs compared to the S20 FE 2022, which may prioritize thermal management over sustained performance.
❓ Is the 25W charging on the S20 FE 2022 slow compared to the iQOO Neo3 5G's 44W charging?
Yes, 25W charging is significantly slower than 44W. The iQOO Neo3 5G can reach a full charge in under an hour, while the S20 FE 2022 will take considerably longer. This makes the iQOO Neo3 a better choice for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 support software updates for longer than the iQOO Neo3 5G?
Samsung generally provides longer software support for its devices than vivo. The S20 FE 2022 is likely to receive more Android version updates and security patches over its lifespan compared to the iQOO Neo3 5G.
❓ What are the benefits of reverse wireless charging on the S20 FE 2022?
Reverse wireless charging allows you to use the S20 FE 2022 to wirelessly charge other devices, such as earbuds or smartwatches. While the 4.5W output is slow, it can be a convenient feature for topping up smaller accessories when a power outlet isn't available.
