iQOO Neo3 5G vs Realme X50 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 865 Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and rapid replenishment, the Realme X50 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its 65W charging, achieving a full charge in just 35 minutes, combined with a 90-hour endurance rating, outweighs the iQOO Neo3’s slightly faster CPU clock speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo3 5G | Realme X50 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 25, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (3.3 Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 23. Released 2020, April 29 | 2020, February 24. Released 2020, March 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.6 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.1 g (6.98 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.0 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, iQOO UI 1.0 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.5, 54mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 20 min, 100% in 58 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black/Dark Blue | Moss Green, Rust Red |
| Models | V1981A | RMX2075, RMX2071, RMX2076 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 90h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 592447 (v8) GeekBench: 3175 (v5.1) GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G
- Potentially slightly higher sustained CPU performance (though minimal difference)
- Competitive Snapdragon 865 chipset
- 44W fast charging
- Slower charging speed compared to Realme X50 Pro
- No battery endurance rating provided
Realme X50 Pro 5G
- 65W SuperDart charging – significantly faster
- 90-hour endurance rating – longer battery life
- Higher peak display brightness (635 nits)
- CPU performance is effectively identical to iQOO Neo3
- Camera specs are unknown
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize the Snapdragon 865’s capabilities to drive high refresh rate displays, though specific refresh rates aren't provided in the data. The Realme X50 Pro 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 635 nits, suggesting a more visible screen outdoors compared to the iQOO Neo3, for which brightness data is absent. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio on the Realme X50 Pro is a typical marketing term for OLED panels, indicating deep blacks. Without further data on panel technology (e.g., AMOLED vs IPS LCD) or color accuracy, the Realme X50 Pro’s higher peak brightness gives it a slight edge for visual clarity.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but the provided data lacks specifics on sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS). Without this information, a meaningful camera comparison is impossible. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to be a significant selling point, as these sensors typically lack detail and dynamic range. Image processing algorithms, a key differentiator, are also unknown. Therefore, camera performance remains an unquantifiable difference based on the available data.
Performance
Both the iQOO Neo3 5G and the Realme X50 Pro 5G are powered by the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+). Critically, both share the same CPU core configuration: an octa-core setup with 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55. This means theoretical CPU performance will be nearly identical. The 7nm+ fabrication process on the Snapdragon 865 is optimized for efficiency, but thermal management – not specified here – will ultimately determine sustained performance under load. The lack of LPDDR5x RAM specifications prevents a detailed memory bandwidth comparison, but both likely utilize fast LPDDR5 RAM to complement the chipset.
Battery Life
The Realme X50 Pro 5G holds a significant advantage in battery and charging. Its 90-hour endurance rating, while a standardized test, suggests superior battery life compared to the iQOO Neo3, for which endurance data is unavailable. More importantly, the Realme X50 Pro’s 65W wired charging, supporting Power Delivery (PD), completes a full charge in just 35 minutes. The iQOO Neo3’s 44W charging, while respectable, takes considerably longer – 50% in 20 minutes and 100% in 58 minutes. This faster charging speed is a major benefit for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo3 5G if you prioritize raw CPU performance for demanding tasks and are comfortable with a slightly slower charging experience. Buy the Realme X50 Pro 5G if you value sustained performance, faster charging, and a longer-lasting battery, making it ideal for heavy users and gamers who need to minimize downtime.