iQOO Neo3 5G vs Oppo Find X2 Neo: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and gaming, the iQOO Neo3 5G is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 865. However, the Oppo Find X2 Neo offers a very competitive experience with comparable battery life and a potentially smoother software experience for everyday tasks, making it a strong contender for those less focused on peak power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo3 5G | Oppo Find X2 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 25, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 78 NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (3.3 Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G 3.7/1.6 Gbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 23. Released 2020, April 29 | 2020, April 15. Released 2020, May 21 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.6 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 159.4 x 72.4 x 7.7 mm (6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.1 g (6.98 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.0 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | AMOLED, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, iQOO UI 1.0 | Android 10, ColorOS 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 20 min, 100% in 58 min | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4025 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black/Dark Blue | Moonlight Black, Starry Blue |
| Models | V1981A | CPH2009 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 308231 (v8) GeekBench: 1815(v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 865)
- Superior gaming performance
- Faster charging (44W)
- Potentially higher power consumption
- May run hotter under sustained load
Oppo Find X2 Neo
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- Excellent battery endurance
- Potentially smoother software experience
- Less powerful processor (Snapdragon 765G)
- Inferior gaming performance
Display Comparison
Both the iQOO Neo3 5G and Oppo Find X2 Neo boast displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given Oppo’s history with high-quality displays, the Find X2 Neo likely offers a more color-accurate panel. The lack of information on refresh rates is a key omission; assuming both are 60Hz, the display experience will be similar, but a higher refresh rate on either would be a significant advantage.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference indirectly impacts camera performance. The Snapdragon 865’s image signal processor (ISP) is more powerful, enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Oppo Find X2 Neo’s ISP, while capable, is less advanced. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and optical image stabilization (OIS) makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the iQOO Neo3 5G likely has an edge in image quality due to its superior processing power.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Neo3 5G’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) is a flagship processor featuring an octa-core configuration with a prime Cortex-A77 core clocked at 2.84 GHz. This contrasts with the Oppo Find X2 Neo’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm), which utilizes a Kryo 475 architecture with a lower peak clock speed of 2.4 GHz. The 865’s superior CPU and Adreno 650 GPU translate to significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and substantially better gaming performance. While the 765G is capable, the 865 offers headroom for future software updates and demanding applications. The iQOO Neo3 5G is likely to exhibit better sustained performance due to the more advanced 7nm+ node, potentially mitigating thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve a 50% charge in 20 minutes, indicating similar charging speeds despite the iQOO Neo3 5G’s higher 44W charging versus the Oppo Find X2 Neo’s 30W. Both devices have an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting comparable battery life. However, the Snapdragon 865 in the iQOO Neo3 5G is more power-hungry. Therefore, the similar endurance rating likely means the iQOO Neo3 5G has a larger battery capacity, offsetting the increased power draw. The iQOO Neo3 5G reaches 100% charge in 58 minutes, while the Oppo Find X2 Neo’s full charge time is not specified, but is likely longer.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo3 5G if you need uncompromising performance for demanding games, frequent multitasking, and future-proofing. Its Snapdragon 865 provides a significant advantage in CPU and GPU intensive tasks. Buy the Oppo Find X2 Neo if you prefer a balanced smartphone experience with solid performance for everyday use, excellent battery endurance, and a potentially more refined user interface. It’s ideal for users who don’t require the absolute highest level of processing power.