iQOO Neo3 5G vs OnePlus 8T+ 5G: A Deep Dive into Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 8T+ 5G emerges as the superior choice. While both phones share the same Snapdragon 865 processor, the OnePlus 8T+’s 65W charging – achieving a full charge in just 39 minutes – is a game-changer, offsetting the iQOO Neo3’s slightly lower price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo3 5G | OnePlus 8T+ 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 25, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71 Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (3.3 Gbps DL) | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G 7.5 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 23. Released 2020, April 29 | 2020, October 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, October 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.6 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 160.7 x 74.1 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.1 g (6.98 oz) | - |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.0 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | Fluid AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, iQOO UI 1.0 | Android 11, OxygenOS 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (market dependant) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 20 min, 100% in 58 min | 65W wired, 100% in 39 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black/Dark Blue | Aquamarine Green, Lunar Silver |
| Models | V1981A | KB2007 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 640 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G
- Potentially lower price point
- Snapdragon 865 5G performance
- Functional camera system
- Slower 44W charging
- Potentially less refined software experience
OnePlus 8T+ 5G
- Ultra-fast 65W charging
- Likely superior camera system
- Potentially better thermal management
- Higher price point
- Snapdragon 865 5G performance (shared with iQOO)
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize AMOLED panels, but detailed specifications like resolution, refresh rate, and peak brightness are missing from the provided data. However, given the market positioning, the OnePlus 8T+ likely boasts a higher peak brightness and potentially a more color-accurate display. The iQOO Neo3, focusing on value, may have slightly compromised on display quality to reduce costs. Bezels are likely comparable, given both aim for a modern aesthetic.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, OnePlus generally prioritizes camera quality in its ‘T’ series updates. It’s reasonable to assume the OnePlus 8T+ features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and improved image processing algorithms. The iQOO Neo3 likely focuses on providing a functional camera experience, but may lack the advanced features and image quality of the OnePlus offering. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a camera-centric flagship.
Performance
The core performance is identical: both the iQOO Neo3 5G and OnePlus 8T+ 5G are powered by the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+). The CPU configuration – Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) – is also identical. Therefore, raw processing power will be nearly indistinguishable. However, thermal management could differ. OnePlus typically employs more aggressive cooling solutions, potentially leading to sustained performance during extended gaming sessions, mitigating potential throttling. The type of RAM (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR5) is unknown, but the OnePlus 8T+ is more likely to feature faster RAM.
Battery Life
This is where the most significant difference lies. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the charging speeds are. The iQOO Neo3 5G supports 44W wired charging, reaching 50% in 20 minutes and 100% in 58 minutes. The OnePlus 8T+ 5G, however, boasts a remarkable 65W wired charging capability, achieving a full charge in just 39 minutes. This 19-minute difference is substantial, offering a significant convenience advantage to OnePlus users. A larger battery capacity on the iQOO Neo3 would be needed to offset this charging speed disparity.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo3 5G if your primary concern is maximizing value for money and you’re willing to trade charging speed for a lower upfront cost. Buy the OnePlus 8T+ 5G if you prioritize convenience and rapid replenishment of battery life, and appreciate a more refined software experience and faster charging capabilities.